Comparison Overview

Rx Systems, Inc.

VS

COT Holdings Ltd

Rx Systems, Inc.

121 Point West Blvd., Saint Charles, MO, 63301, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Rx Systems, Inc. is a full-service provider of pharmacy packaging and supplies. For over 40 years, Rx Systems has helped pharmacies develop products and strategies to better serve their patients more efficiently. We do this by designing, manufacturing, and distributing items specifically for the pharmacy field. Rx Systems offers labels, forms, bags, vials, counter supplies, and packaging supplies for all types of pharmacy markets. The success of our company began with a simple slogan that still holds true today, "Customer Service is Our Business!"

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

COT Holdings Ltd

16 Newton Industrial Estate, Christ Church, BB, BB17047
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

At COT, we’re more than just printers — we’re your creative production partner. Since 1975, we’ve evolved from a traditional print house into a full-service provider offering print, large-format, publishing, marketing, and design — all under one roof at our Newton Industrial Estate facility in Barbados. We specialize in bringing brands to life through tangible, high-impact solutions that connect directly with your audience. Whether you’re packaging a product, launching a campaign, or publishing a magazine, we help you stand out — with precision, creativity, and quality at every step. Let’s turn your next idea into something real, memorable, and ready to hold.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rx-systems-inc-.jpeg
Rx Systems, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cot-holdings-ltd.jpeg
COT Holdings Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rx Systems, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
COT Holdings Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rx Systems, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COT Holdings Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Rx Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rx Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — COT Holdings Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COT Holdings Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rx-systems-inc-.jpeg
Rx Systems, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cot-holdings-ltd.jpeg
COT Holdings Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Rx Systems, Inc. company and COT Holdings Ltd company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, COT Holdings Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rx Systems, Inc. company.

In the current year, COT Holdings Ltd company and Rx Systems, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither COT Holdings Ltd company nor Rx Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither COT Holdings Ltd company nor Rx Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither COT Holdings Ltd company nor Rx Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rx Systems, Inc. company nor COT Holdings Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rx Systems, Inc. nor COT Holdings Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rx Systems, Inc. company nor COT Holdings Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rx Systems, Inc. company employs more people globally than COT Holdings Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Rx Systems, Inc. nor COT Holdings Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rx Systems, Inc. nor COT Holdings Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rx Systems, Inc. nor COT Holdings Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rx Systems, Inc. nor COT Holdings Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rx Systems, Inc. nor COT Holdings Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rx Systems, Inc. nor COT Holdings Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N