Comparison Overview

RWJBarnabas Health

VS

Corewell Health

RWJBarnabas Health

95 Old Short Hills Rd, West Orange, 07052, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.rwjbh.org/careers/

RWJBarnabas Health is New Jersey’s largest and most comprehensive academic health system, caring for more than 5 million people annually. Nationally renowned for quality and safety, the system includes 14 hospitals and 9,000 affiliated physicians integrated to provide care at more than 700 patient care locations. RWJBarnabas Health is among New Jersey’s largest private employers, with more than 44,000 employees, contributing more than $5.5 billion to the state economy every year. RWJBarnabas Health partners with its diverse communities to build and sustain a healthier New Jersey. It provides patient-centered care in a compassionate and equitable manner. RWJBarnabas Health’s commitment to enhancing access to care includes a transformative partnership with Rutgers University, including the Rutgers Cancer Institute — the state's only NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center - and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 24,556
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Corewell Health

None
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 700 and 749
http://corewellhealth.org

People are at the heart of everything we do, and the inspiration for our legacy of outstanding outcomes, innovation, strong community partnerships, philanthropy and transparency. Corewell Health is a not-for-profit health system that provides health care and coverage with an exceptional team of 65,000+ dedicated people—including more than 12,000 physicians and advanced practice providers and more than 15,500 nurses providing care and services in 21 hospitals, 300+ outpatient locations and several post-acute facilities—and Priority Health, a provider-sponsored health plan serving more than 1.3 million members. Through experience and collaboration, we are reimagining a better, more equitable model of health and wellness. For more information, visit corewellhealth.org.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 41,961
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rwjbarnabashealth.jpeg
RWJBarnabas Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corewell-health.jpeg
Corewell Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RWJBarnabas Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Corewell Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RWJBarnabas Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corewell Health in 2026.

Incident History — RWJBarnabas Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RWJBarnabas Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Corewell Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corewell Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rwjbarnabashealth.jpeg
RWJBarnabas Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corewell-health.jpeg
Corewell Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Zero-Day Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

RWJBarnabas Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Corewell Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Corewell Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas RWJBarnabas Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Corewell Health company and RWJBarnabas Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Corewell Health company nor RWJBarnabas Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Corewell Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while RWJBarnabas Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Corewell Health company nor RWJBarnabas Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RWJBarnabas Health company nor Corewell Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RWJBarnabas Health nor Corewell Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RWJBarnabas Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Corewell Health company.

Corewell Health company employs more people globally than RWJBarnabas Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither RWJBarnabas Health nor Corewell Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RWJBarnabas Health nor Corewell Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RWJBarnabas Health nor Corewell Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RWJBarnabas Health nor Corewell Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RWJBarnabas Health nor Corewell Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RWJBarnabas Health nor Corewell Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References