Comparison Overview

RWI

VS

Enroll America

RWI

Bezuidenhoutseweg 60, 's-Gravenhage, Zuid Holland, undefined, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

De Raad voor Werk en Inkomen (RWI) is het overlegorgaan en expertisecentrum van werkgevers, werknemers en gemeenten. De RWI doet voorstellen aan de regering en andere partijen over het brede terrein van werk en inkomen. Doel van deze voorstellen is een goed functionerende arbeidsmarkt te bevorderen. Het vergroten van de transparantie van en het verbeteren van de kwaliteit op de re-integratiemarkt behoren eveneens tot de kerntaken van de RWI. www.rwi.nl.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Enroll America

1001 G Street, N.W, Washington, District of Columbia, 20001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Enroll America accomplishes its work by engaging a wide variety of organizations with a stake in enrolling the uninsured in health coverage. Our partners include health insurers, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, employers, consumer organizations, faith-based organizations, civic organizations, and philanthropies. -We track the latest information on “best practices” for optimizing enrollment, and share that information widely. -We provide guidance and assistance to help states and the federal government adopt streamlined and user-friendly enrollment policies, procedures, and practices. -We work to raise awareness of enrollment options among the uninsured and broaden the range of channels through which uninsured individuals can enroll.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rwi.jpeg
RWI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enroll-america.jpeg
Enroll America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RWI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Enroll America
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RWI in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enroll America in 2025.

Incident History — RWI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RWI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Enroll America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enroll America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rwi.jpeg
RWI
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enroll-america.jpeg
Enroll America
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RWI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Enroll America company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Enroll America company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RWI company.

In the current year, Enroll America company and RWI company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Enroll America company nor RWI company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Enroll America company nor RWI company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Enroll America company nor RWI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RWI company nor Enroll America company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RWI nor Enroll America holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RWI company nor Enroll America company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RWI company employs more people globally than Enroll America company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither RWI nor Enroll America holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RWI nor Enroll America holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RWI nor Enroll America holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RWI nor Enroll America holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RWI nor Enroll America holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RWI nor Enroll America holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H