Comparison Overview

Running Warehouse

VS

FinditParts

Running Warehouse

181 Suburban Road, None, San Luis Obispo, CA, US, 93401
Last Update: 2025-12-28

Running Warehouse is America’s Finest Running Specialty Store. Our customers are dedicated runners who care about the sport and are looking for the latest products to help them perform at peak levels. We carefully select every product we carry, with the goal of offering only those products that will benefit athletes, competitors, and people who are serious about the sport of running. We carry running shoes from Nike, adidas, Altra, Asics, Brooks, INOV8, La Sportiva, Merrell, Mizuno, Montrail, New Balance, Newton, The North Face, Pearl Izumi, Salomon, Saucony and Zoot. We also carry running apparel from most of these brands along with BOA, Craft, CWX, GORE Running, Moving Comfort, Sugoi, Under Armour and 2XU. In the running accessories category, look to us for the latest in GPS watches, run watches, heart rate monitors, nutrition, hats and gloves, socks, and many other items to improve your running experience. We are committed to selecting educated, engaged staff members with a passion for running. If you are interested in a career with us, please get in touch online or apply in person in our retail store located at 181 Suburban Road in San Luis Obispo.

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

FinditParts

11858 La Grange Ave, Los Angeles, 90025, US
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 750 and 799

FinditParts is the nation’s largest eCommerce provider of heavy-duty truck and trailer parts. From hard-to-find parts to everyday preventative maintenance items, we offer more than 4 million heavy-duty OEM, branded, and aftermarket parts ready to ship. Each month thousands of repair shops, fleets, and owner-operators rely on FinditParts to streamline their part-sourcing efforts and keep their trucks on the road.

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/running-warehouse.jpeg
Running Warehouse
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finditparts.jpeg
FinditParts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Running Warehouse
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FinditParts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Running Warehouse in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FinditParts in 2025.

Incident History — Running Warehouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Running Warehouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FinditParts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FinditParts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/running-warehouse.jpeg
Running Warehouse
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finditparts.jpeg
FinditParts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FinditParts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Running Warehouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Running Warehouse company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas FinditParts company has not reported any.

In the current year, FinditParts company and Running Warehouse company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FinditParts company nor Running Warehouse company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Running Warehouse company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other FinditParts company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither FinditParts company nor Running Warehouse company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Running Warehouse company nor FinditParts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Running Warehouse nor FinditParts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Running Warehouse company nor FinditParts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Running Warehouse company employs more people globally than FinditParts company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither Running Warehouse nor FinditParts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Running Warehouse nor FinditParts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Running Warehouse nor FinditParts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Running Warehouse nor FinditParts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Running Warehouse nor FinditParts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Running Warehouse nor FinditParts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X