Comparison Overview

RUGIDO

VS

Scixel

RUGIDO

C/Facetos 3, 6º Izda Oviedo, Asturias 33013, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

RUGIDO es un estudio especializado en servicios profesionales de ilustración, diseño gráfico e identidad corporativa. RUGIDO representa la evolución de una carrera profesional iniciada en 2001, enfocada en esta nueva etapa en el campo de la ilustración aunque sin perder de vista la experiencia de 15 años en el diseño gráfico. De este modo, podemos abarcar los proyectos desde una perspectiva amplia y flexible, combinando ambas facetas profesionales. ¡Lo mejor de ambos mundos!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Scixel

Madrid, Madrid 28053, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

Graphic Solutions for Scientists and Engineers. We make visual products to complete and improve the comunication of scientific and technical works and presentations in all kind of fields: talks, presentations, papers, magazine covers, mass media communications, etc. Our products cover a wide range of elements: - Pictures - Animation - Webpages - Visual simulations - Posters - Music jingles -> Being scientists with a background in physics and biology we will have a better understanding of your request. This will give you a higher quality product. -> Having a better understanding of your requests, things will go faster. -> The faster things go, the cheaper the product will be.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rugido.jpeg
RUGIDO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scixel.jpeg
Scixel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RUGIDO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scixel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RUGIDO in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scixel in 2025.

Incident History — RUGIDO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RUGIDO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scixel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scixel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rugido.jpeg
RUGIDO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scixel.jpeg
Scixel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RUGIDO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Scixel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Scixel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RUGIDO company.

In the current year, Scixel company and RUGIDO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scixel company nor RUGIDO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scixel company nor RUGIDO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scixel company nor RUGIDO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RUGIDO company nor Scixel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RUGIDO nor Scixel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RUGIDO company nor Scixel company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both RUGIDO company and Scixel company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither RUGIDO nor Scixel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RUGIDO nor Scixel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RUGIDO nor Scixel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RUGIDO nor Scixel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RUGIDO nor Scixel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RUGIDO nor Scixel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X