Comparison Overview

Rudico

VS

Main Street Signs

Rudico

Coldenhovenseweg 85, Eerbeek, 6961 EC, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

With more than 50 years of experience, Rudico Prepress operates in every segment of the flexographic packaging industry. Standardised processes and consistent process- based thinking to meet the customer’s needs mean that every idea is converted into a perfect image carrier by a skilful, enthusiastic team. Rudico Prepress has its own online customer portal, which makes it very easy to supply documents. The customer can also find the latest status of the order on the customer portal, which creates openness and transparency. In addition, it speeds up communication between the customer and Rudico Prepress, which has a positive effect on the delivery time of the image carrier. To guarantee high quality, Rudico operates based on a standardised system, and Rudico Prepress is ISO 9001:2008 certified. People and the environment are also very important to Rudico Prepress, which is why it operates according to the ISO 14001, ISO 22000 and DFTA standards.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Main Street Signs

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

We are a full service sign manufacturer and supplier of all traffic related items. We market our traffic signs and related products to cities, counties, school districts, as well as private businesses. Our online store is mostly utilized by city buyers looking to complete transactions with the use of credit card, rather than go through the credit process to use a purchase order. Please feel free to contact me if you are a manufacturer wanting us to represent your line, if you are a city employee/buyer, or if you are a non-competing sign company looking for wholesale pricing. Email: [email protected] Office: (909) 391-0988

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rudico.jpeg
Rudico
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/main-street-signs.jpeg
Main Street Signs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rudico
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Main Street Signs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rudico in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Main Street Signs in 2025.

Incident History — Rudico (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rudico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Main Street Signs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Main Street Signs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rudico.jpeg
Rudico
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/main-street-signs.jpeg
Main Street Signs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Main Street Signs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rudico company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Main Street Signs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rudico company.

In the current year, Main Street Signs company and Rudico company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Main Street Signs company nor Rudico company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Main Street Signs company nor Rudico company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Main Street Signs company nor Rudico company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rudico company nor Main Street Signs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rudico nor Main Street Signs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rudico company nor Main Street Signs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rudico company employs more people globally than Main Street Signs company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Rudico nor Main Street Signs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rudico nor Main Street Signs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rudico nor Main Street Signs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rudico nor Main Street Signs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rudico nor Main Street Signs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rudico nor Main Street Signs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N