Comparison Overview

Ruderman & Knox, LLP

VS

Cheshire Law Group

Ruderman & Knox, LLP

1300 National Drive, Sacramento, California 95834, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We provide legal advice and representation to parents of children with special needs. We represent families to ensure that their child receives a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). We also can help families looking to pursue a conservatorship for their adult special needs child. This includes representation in the state and local administrative processes, i.e., due process mediations and ...hearings; and in state and federal court.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cheshire Law Group

5275 Germantown Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19144, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Cheshire Law Group exclusively represents nonprofit organizations. The firm provides affordable and accessible legal services, bringing sophisticated legal counsel within reach for the nonprofit sector. Our clients are nonprofit organizations that can cost-effectively resolve their legal issues or build capacity for their futures by leveraging the talents and experience of legal counsel who understand the sector’s unique tax and legal issues. Working with us, nonprofit organizations gain access to partner-level nonprofit expertise at junior associate rates. Each of our lawyers has worked in the nonprofit sector and has demonstrated a serious professional commitment to serving the sector. Nonprofit organizations deserve legal advice they can call on. Whether considering new opportunities, navigating difficult dynamics, or seeking guidance to understanding and negotiating contract terms, nonprofits benefit most from having counsel who understand their business, their budgets, and the specific issues they encounter. Since being founded in 2011, we have represented over 280 organizations as outside general counsel, on an as-needed basis or on retainer, depending on client preferences.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ruderman-&-knox-llp.jpeg
Ruderman & Knox, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cheshire-law-group.jpeg
Cheshire Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ruderman & Knox, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cheshire Law Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ruderman & Knox, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cheshire Law Group in 2025.

Incident History — Ruderman & Knox, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ruderman & Knox, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cheshire Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cheshire Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ruderman-&-knox-llp.jpeg
Ruderman & Knox, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cheshire-law-group.jpeg
Cheshire Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ruderman & Knox, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cheshire Law Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cheshire Law Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ruderman & Knox, LLP company.

In the current year, Cheshire Law Group company and Ruderman & Knox, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cheshire Law Group company nor Ruderman & Knox, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cheshire Law Group company nor Ruderman & Knox, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cheshire Law Group company nor Ruderman & Knox, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ruderman & Knox, LLP company nor Cheshire Law Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ruderman & Knox, LLP nor Cheshire Law Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ruderman & Knox, LLP company nor Cheshire Law Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ruderman & Knox, LLP company employs more people globally than Cheshire Law Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Ruderman & Knox, LLP nor Cheshire Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ruderman & Knox, LLP nor Cheshire Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ruderman & Knox, LLP nor Cheshire Law Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ruderman & Knox, LLP nor Cheshire Law Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ruderman & Knox, LLP nor Cheshire Law Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ruderman & Knox, LLP nor Cheshire Law Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X