Comparison Overview

RLK Solicitors

VS

Law Office of Jack Clay

RLK Solicitors

26 Calthorpe Road, Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 1RP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

RLK are a friendly team of legal experts, offering a wide range of services to our clients. Conveyancing, Litigation, Wills and Probate, Family and Divorce, Business Interruption. Fundamental to our success is the strong relationships we build with our clients, resulting in a strong reputation in the local area and throughout the UK. The quality of service and advice we provide comes from a deep understanding of our service areas, strengthened by our experienced team who continuously strive to stay ahead of market trends and current news. We can support you and your business by providing advice and consultancy on: Private Client: Wills and Trusts Probate and Estate Administration Lasting Powers of Attorney Deputyship Conveyancing: Property Management Residential Commercial Litigation: Civil and Commercial Litigation Insolvency Contested Probate Insurance Business Interruption Insurance Claims Matrimonial and Family: Divorce Separation Financial Settlements Dissolution Contact orders Non-molestation orders Arrangement for children Domestic violence Injunctions Pre-nuptial agreements Visit our website for the latest news and updates.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Law Office of Jack Clay

8701 Hospital Drive, Douglasville, GA 30134, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Douglasville based courtroom attorneys specialing in serious personal injury, wrongful death, and workers' compensation handing cases throughout Metro Atlanta and the State of Georgia. We have successfully represented hundreds of seriously injured people and take pride in obtaining the best results possible for our clients. Whether you would like us to confidentially answer your questions about a case without any cost or obligation, or are condidering hiring an attorney and would like to learn more about what we can offer, call us today at 770-577-2227.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rubric-lois-king-solicitors.jpeg
RLK Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-office-of-jack-clay.jpeg
Law Office of Jack Clay
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RLK Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Law Office of Jack Clay
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RLK Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law Office of Jack Clay in 2025.

Incident History — RLK Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RLK Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Law Office of Jack Clay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law Office of Jack Clay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rubric-lois-king-solicitors.jpeg
RLK Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-office-of-jack-clay.jpeg
Law Office of Jack Clay
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Law Office of Jack Clay company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RLK Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Law Office of Jack Clay company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RLK Solicitors company.

In the current year, Law Office of Jack Clay company and RLK Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Law Office of Jack Clay company nor RLK Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Law Office of Jack Clay company nor RLK Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Law Office of Jack Clay company nor RLK Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RLK Solicitors company nor Law Office of Jack Clay company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RLK Solicitors nor Law Office of Jack Clay holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RLK Solicitors company nor Law Office of Jack Clay company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RLK Solicitors company employs more people globally than Law Office of Jack Clay company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither RLK Solicitors nor Law Office of Jack Clay holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RLK Solicitors nor Law Office of Jack Clay holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RLK Solicitors nor Law Office of Jack Clay holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RLK Solicitors nor Law Office of Jack Clay holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RLK Solicitors nor Law Office of Jack Clay holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RLK Solicitors nor Law Office of Jack Clay holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X