Comparison Overview

Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art

VS

Mystic Aquarium

Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art

150 West 17th street, New York, New York, 10011, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rubinmuseum.org

The Rubin is a global museum dedicated to presenting Himalayan art and its insights. Founded in 2004, the Rubin serves people internationally through exhibitions, participatory experiences, a dynamic digital platform, and partnerships. Inspired and informed by Himalayan art, the Rubin invites people to contemplate the human experience and deepen connections with the world around them in order to expand awareness, enhance well-being, and cultivate compassion. The Rubin advances scholarship through a series of educational initiatives, grants, collection sharing, and the stewardship of a collection of nearly 4,000 Himalayan art objects spanning 1,500 years of history—providing unprecedented access and resources to scholars, artists, and students across the globe.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 122
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mystic Aquarium

55 Coogan Blvd, Mystic, CT, 06355, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mysticaquarium.org

Mystic Aquarium is a division of Sea Research Foundation, Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization, and is counted among the nation’s leading aquariums with more than 300 species and an extensive collection of marine mammals, including New England’s only beluga whales. Mystic Aquarium has been a pioneer in offering guests a variety of up close encounters with a wide range of marine animals. The mission of Mystic Aquarium is to inspire people to care for and protect our ocean environment through conservation, education and research.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 314
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rubin-museum-of-art.jpeg
Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mystic-aquarium-official.jpeg
Mystic Aquarium
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mystic Aquarium
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mystic Aquarium in 2026.

Incident History — Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mystic Aquarium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mystic Aquarium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rubin-museum-of-art.jpeg
Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mystic-aquarium-official.jpeg
Mystic Aquarium
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mystic Aquarium company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mystic Aquarium company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art company.

In the current year, Mystic Aquarium company and Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mystic Aquarium company nor Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mystic Aquarium company nor Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mystic Aquarium company nor Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art company nor Mystic Aquarium company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art nor Mystic Aquarium holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art company nor Mystic Aquarium company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mystic Aquarium company employs more people globally than Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art nor Mystic Aquarium holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art nor Mystic Aquarium holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art nor Mystic Aquarium holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art nor Mystic Aquarium holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art nor Mystic Aquarium holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rubin Museum of Himalayan Art nor Mystic Aquarium holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References