Comparison Overview

RTape, A Nekoosa Brand

VS

The Image Inks Company

RTape, A Nekoosa Brand

740 Ford St, Kimberly, Wisconsin, 54136, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

RTape is recognized as the world's leading manufacturer of application tape and premasks for the sign, screen printing and digital printing marketplaces. RTape Corp. was acquired by Nekoosa in April 2013. With 60 years of history as a premier manufacturer of specialty print media, Nekoosa has established a reputation and legacy built on quality and innovation. Today, Nekoosa’s expertise in specialty print media includes a variety of product offerings – wide and grand format rolls; offset, screen, HP Indigo and dry toner sheets; cut films; application tapes and premasks; carbonless paper; and extruded films.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Image Inks Company

undefined, Evansville, Indiana, 47711, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At Image Inks, continued innovation for the dry-offset plastic printing industry is priority for us. Image Inks is one of the leading single source suppliers to the plastic cup, tube and lid printing industry. Although, most of our customers know us as a top quality UV ink and blanket supplier, Image Inks is a supplier of a wide range of products that include: printing blankets, UV printing inks, UV lamps, roller recovering, and many other press room supplies.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rtape.jpeg
RTape, A Nekoosa Brand
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-image-inks-company.jpeg
The Image Inks Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RTape, A Nekoosa Brand
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Image Inks Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RTape, A Nekoosa Brand in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Image Inks Company in 2025.

Incident History — RTape, A Nekoosa Brand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RTape, A Nekoosa Brand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Image Inks Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Image Inks Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rtape.jpeg
RTape, A Nekoosa Brand
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-image-inks-company.jpeg
The Image Inks Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Image Inks Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RTape, A Nekoosa Brand company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Image Inks Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RTape, A Nekoosa Brand company.

In the current year, The Image Inks Company company and RTape, A Nekoosa Brand company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Image Inks Company company nor RTape, A Nekoosa Brand company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Image Inks Company company nor RTape, A Nekoosa Brand company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Image Inks Company company nor RTape, A Nekoosa Brand company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RTape, A Nekoosa Brand company nor The Image Inks Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RTape, A Nekoosa Brand nor The Image Inks Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RTape, A Nekoosa Brand company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Image Inks Company company.

The Image Inks Company company employs more people globally than RTape, A Nekoosa Brand company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither RTape, A Nekoosa Brand nor The Image Inks Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RTape, A Nekoosa Brand nor The Image Inks Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RTape, A Nekoosa Brand nor The Image Inks Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RTape, A Nekoosa Brand nor The Image Inks Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RTape, A Nekoosa Brand nor The Image Inks Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RTape, A Nekoosa Brand nor The Image Inks Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N