Comparison Overview

RSPCA WA

VS

National Park Foundation

RSPCA WA

108 Malaga Drive, Malaga, 6090, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 750 and 799

RSPCA WA has been the voice for animals in Western Australia for over 130 years. RSPCA WA’s primary responsibility is to enforce the Animal Welfare Act (2002). As a charity, we work with government, industry bodies and the community to improve animal welfare and campaign on issues such as stamping out backyard breeding, promoting higher welfare food practices, and ending live animal export. RSPCA WA is the state’s largest animal welfare charity, and relies on generous donations and the support of the community for over 80 per cent of the funding needed to conduct our animal protection work. Last financial year RSPCA WA investigated 7,138 cruelty complaints. We cared for 2,441 animals suffering from cruelty, neglect and abuse, helping to rescue, rehabilitate and rehome them. RSPCA WA works in the community to provide support for pets caught in domestic violence; to help families experiencing financial hardship look after their pets’ needs; and to educate young people on animal welfare issues in their communities. There are many ways you can support animals in need in WA – through donations, fundraising events, volunteering, foster care, sponsorships or adopting a rescued animal. Visit rspcawa.org.au for more information.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Park Foundation

None, None, Washington, DC, US, 20005
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

The National Park Foundation works to protect wildlife and park lands, preserve history and culture, educate and engage youth, and connect people everywhere to the wonder of parks. We do it in collaboration with the National Park Service, the park partner community, and with the generous support of donors, without whom our work would not be possible.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 156
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-park-foundation.jpeg
National Park Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RSPCA WA
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Park Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RSPCA WA in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Park Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — RSPCA WA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RSPCA WA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Park Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Park Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rspca-wa.jpeg
RSPCA WA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-park-foundation.jpeg
National Park Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Park Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RSPCA WA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Park Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RSPCA WA company.

In the current year, National Park Foundation company and RSPCA WA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Park Foundation company nor RSPCA WA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Park Foundation company nor RSPCA WA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Park Foundation company nor RSPCA WA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RSPCA WA company nor National Park Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RSPCA WA nor National Park Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RSPCA WA company nor National Park Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Park Foundation company employs more people globally than RSPCA WA company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither RSPCA WA nor National Park Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RSPCA WA nor National Park Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RSPCA WA nor National Park Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RSPCA WA nor National Park Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RSPCA WA nor National Park Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RSPCA WA nor National Park Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N