Comparison Overview

RPI Print

VS

Quality Graphic Services

RPI Print

undefined, Seattle, WA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

At RPI, we're driven by a common belief in the unique ability of tangible, tactile and engaging personalized print to make real connections between people, businesses and their customers in ways that expand markets and build brands. For more than 30 years in locations in the US and Europe, we've enabled our customers to do just that. As business-to-business providers, we’re about showcasing your brand (not our own) and we work hard to earn that privilege every day through commitment to exceptional quality, scalability, innovation and reliability. For more information, please visit www.rpiprint.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 155
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Quality Graphic Services

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Since 1986 the staff at Quality Graphic Services, Inc. (QGS), has strived to produce the highest quality printed matter possible with a strong emphasis on customer satisfaction. With roots in hands on pre-press, press and bindery production, our staff’s knowledge of over-all capabilities is an invaluable tool for our clients to utilize.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rpi-eu.jpeg
RPI Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-graphic-services.jpeg
Quality Graphic Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RPI Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Quality Graphic Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RPI Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Graphic Services in 2025.

Incident History — RPI Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RPI Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Quality Graphic Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Graphic Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rpi-eu.jpeg
RPI Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-graphic-services.jpeg
Quality Graphic Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Quality Graphic Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RPI Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Quality Graphic Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RPI Print company.

In the current year, Quality Graphic Services company and RPI Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Quality Graphic Services company nor RPI Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Quality Graphic Services company nor RPI Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Quality Graphic Services company nor RPI Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RPI Print company nor Quality Graphic Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RPI Print nor Quality Graphic Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RPI Print company nor Quality Graphic Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RPI Print company employs more people globally than Quality Graphic Services company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither RPI Print nor Quality Graphic Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RPI Print nor Quality Graphic Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RPI Print nor Quality Graphic Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RPI Print nor Quality Graphic Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RPI Print nor Quality Graphic Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RPI Print nor Quality Graphic Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N