Comparison Overview

Roycroft Campus

VS

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County

Roycroft Campus

31 South Grove St., East Aurora, 14052, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.roycroftcampuscorporation.com/index.php

The Roycroft Campus Corporation (RCC) is a not for profit 501(c)3 organization dedicated to the preservation and restoration of the Roycroft Campus, a National Historic Landmark in East Aurora, New York. From 1895 to 1938, the Roycroft Campus was one of the most successful and well-known components of the Arts & Crafts Movement in the United States, consisting of a community of over 500 artisans and craftspeople led by writer and charismatic leader, Elbert Hubbard. In addition to preserving the Roycroft Campus, the RCC’s mission is to inspire visitors to experience the history, ideals, and possibilities of the Head, Heart, Hand philosophy and the art it creates.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County

900 Exposition Blvd, Los Angeles, California, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://nhm.org

The NHM has amassed one of the world’s most extensive and valuable collections of natural and cultural history — more than 35 million objects, some as old as 4.5 billion years. Its curatorial staff not only cares for those collections, but uses them for groundbreaking scientific and historic research. The Museum also curates new, immersive exhibitions that give visitors the opportunity to explore the “big picture” of our planet — specimens and objects, the stories behind them, and the increasing interrelatedness of the natural and cultural worlds. The Natural History Family of Museums is dedicated to seeking employees who have demonstrated experience and commitment working with a diverse community.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 494
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roycroftcampus.jpeg
Roycroft Campus
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhmla.jpeg
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Roycroft Campus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roycroft Campus in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County in 2026.

Incident History — Roycroft Campus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roycroft Campus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roycroftcampus.jpeg
Roycroft Campus
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhmla.jpeg
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Roycroft Campus company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Roycroft Campus company.

In the current year, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company and Roycroft Campus company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company nor Roycroft Campus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company nor Roycroft Campus company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company nor Roycroft Campus company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Roycroft Campus company nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Roycroft Campus company nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company employs more people globally than Roycroft Campus company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References