Comparison Overview

Roycroft Campus

VS

Issaquah History Museums

Roycroft Campus

31 South Grove St., East Aurora, 14052, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Roycroft Campus Corporation (RCC) is a not for profit 501(c)3 organization dedicated to the preservation and restoration of the Roycroft Campus, a National Historic Landmark in East Aurora, New York. From 1895 to 1938, the Roycroft Campus was one of the most successful and well-known components of the Arts & Crafts Movement in the United States, consisting of a community of over 500 artisans and craftspeople led by writer and charismatic leader, Elbert Hubbard. In addition to preserving the Roycroft Campus, the RCC’s mission is to inspire visitors to experience the history, ideals, and possibilities of the Head, Heart, Hand philosophy and the art it creates.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Issaquah History Museums

165 SE Andrews St., Issaquah, 98027, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Issaquah History Museums discovers, preserves, and shares the history of Issaquah and the surrounding area. We are a vital part of keeping our community sustainable! To help share the story of our community, the Issaquah History Museums operate both the Issaquah Depot Museum and the Gilman Town Hall Museum. Through exhibits, guided tours, history hikes, and programs, we help residents and visitors explore Issaquah's development over time and the lives of its residents. We believe that knowledge of the past helps inform future development and creates community through shared identity. Hundreds of artifacts and photos are accessible on our website at www.issaquahhistory.org. Founded in 1972 as the Issaquah Historical Society, the organization was volunteer-run for the first 27 years of its existence. During that time, the organization restored the Issaquah Depot (now on the National Register of Historic Places), renovated the historic Gilman Town Hall, and accepted hundreds of photos and artifacts into the collection. The first paid staff was hired in the early 1990's and the organization is now run through a collaboration of a small staff and an army of dedicated volunteers. Our newest venture, the Issaquah Valley Trolley, connects the past to the present by bringing new life to Issaquah's rails. While technically, IVT is Issaquah's first trolley, the rails of Issaquah have played a large role in the town's development by connecting it to Seattle to deliver the plentiful coal found nearby. Today, the rails again come alive as riders listen to conductors tell stories of the past, illustrated by the passing scenes of historic downtown Issaquah. IVT currently traverses between the Depot and Darigold but will soon reach the Gilman Village shopping area, creating a corridor between the old and the new, between Gilman and historic downtown Issaquah.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roycroftcampus.jpeg
Roycroft Campus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/issaquah-history-museums.jpeg
Issaquah History Museums
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Roycroft Campus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Issaquah History Museums
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roycroft Campus in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Issaquah History Museums in 2025.

Incident History — Roycroft Campus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roycroft Campus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Issaquah History Museums (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Issaquah History Museums cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roycroftcampus.jpeg
Roycroft Campus
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/issaquah-history-museums.jpeg
Issaquah History Museums
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Roycroft Campus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Issaquah History Museums company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Issaquah History Museums company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Roycroft Campus company.

In the current year, Issaquah History Museums company and Roycroft Campus company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Issaquah History Museums company nor Roycroft Campus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Issaquah History Museums company nor Roycroft Campus company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Issaquah History Museums company nor Roycroft Campus company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Roycroft Campus company nor Issaquah History Museums company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Issaquah History Museums holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Roycroft Campus company nor Issaquah History Museums company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Roycroft Campus company employs more people globally than Issaquah History Museums company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Issaquah History Museums holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Issaquah History Museums holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Issaquah History Museums holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Issaquah History Museums holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Issaquah History Museums holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Issaquah History Museums holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X