Comparison Overview

Roycroft Campus

VS

Gibson House Museum

Roycroft Campus

31 South Grove St., East Aurora, 14052, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.roycroftcampuscorporation.com/index.php

The Roycroft Campus Corporation (RCC) is a not for profit 501(c)3 organization dedicated to the preservation and restoration of the Roycroft Campus, a National Historic Landmark in East Aurora, New York. From 1895 to 1938, the Roycroft Campus was one of the most successful and well-known components of the Arts & Crafts Movement in the United States, consisting of a community of over 500 artisans and craftspeople led by writer and charismatic leader, Elbert Hubbard. In addition to preserving the Roycroft Campus, the RCC’s mission is to inspire visitors to experience the history, ideals, and possibilities of the Head, Heart, Hand philosophy and the art it creates.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Gibson House Museum

137 Beacon St, Boston, Massachusetts 02116-1504, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thegibsonhouse.org/

The Gibson House Museum is a private, nonprofit house museum in Boston's historic Back Bay neighborhood. The home served as residence to three generations of Gibson family members and their household staff between 1859 and 1954. The Museum’s four floors of period rooms, including the original kitchen, are a time capsule of domestic life in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roycroftcampus.jpeg
Roycroft Campus
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gibson-house-museum.jpeg
Gibson House Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Roycroft Campus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gibson House Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roycroft Campus in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gibson House Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Roycroft Campus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roycroft Campus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gibson House Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gibson House Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roycroftcampus.jpeg
Roycroft Campus
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gibson-house-museum.jpeg
Gibson House Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Roycroft Campus company and Gibson House Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Gibson House Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Roycroft Campus company.

In the current year, Gibson House Museum company and Roycroft Campus company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gibson House Museum company nor Roycroft Campus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gibson House Museum company nor Roycroft Campus company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gibson House Museum company nor Roycroft Campus company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Roycroft Campus company nor Gibson House Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Gibson House Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Roycroft Campus company nor Gibson House Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gibson House Museum company employs more people globally than Roycroft Campus company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Gibson House Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Gibson House Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Gibson House Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Gibson House Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Gibson House Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Roycroft Campus nor Gibson House Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References