Comparison Overview

Royal Ontario Museum

VS

Historical Society of Long Beach

Royal Ontario Museum

100 Queen's Park, Toronto, M5S 2C6, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.rom.on.ca/en

Opened in 1914, ROM (Royal Ontario Museum) showcases art, culture, and nature from around the world and across time. Today, ROM houses more than 18 million objects, from Egyptian mummies to contemporary sculpture, from meteorites to dinosaurs. ROM is the most visited museum in Canada and one of the top ten museums in North America. It is also the country’s preeminent field research institute, with a diverse range of experts who help us understand the past, make sense of the present, and shape a shared future. Just as impressive is ROM’s facility—a striking combination of heritage architecture and the cutting-edge Michael Lee-Chin Crystal, which marks the Museum as an iconic landmark and global cultural destination. We live on in what we leave behind.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 620
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Historical Society of Long Beach

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hslb.org

The Historical Society of Long Beach collects, preserves and presents local history. Through historical collections, exhibits, and programs we connect people to the past and to the place they live. We present an inclusive community narrative and help create greater understanding of our neighborhoods, the city and its place in the larger world. Through our programs, exhibitions, and collections we engage the community in thinking about what makes Long Beach unique. We maintain a gallery, research center, and archive in the Bixby Knolls neighborhood. The HSLB is staffed by a one day a week bookkeeper, a half time membership coordinator, a full time gallery coordinator, an executive director, and many volunteers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royalontariomuseum.jpeg
Royal Ontario Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-long-beach.jpeg
Historical Society of Long Beach
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal Ontario Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Historical Society of Long Beach
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Ontario Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historical Society of Long Beach in 2026.

Incident History — Royal Ontario Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Ontario Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Historical Society of Long Beach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historical Society of Long Beach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royalontariomuseum.jpeg
Royal Ontario Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-long-beach.jpeg
Historical Society of Long Beach
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Royal Ontario Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historical Society of Long Beach company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Historical Society of Long Beach company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Royal Ontario Museum company.

In the current year, Historical Society of Long Beach company and Royal Ontario Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach company nor Royal Ontario Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach company nor Royal Ontario Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach company nor Royal Ontario Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal Ontario Museum company nor Historical Society of Long Beach company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal Ontario Museum nor Historical Society of Long Beach holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Royal Ontario Museum company nor Historical Society of Long Beach company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Ontario Museum company employs more people globally than Historical Society of Long Beach company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Royal Ontario Museum nor Historical Society of Long Beach holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal Ontario Museum nor Historical Society of Long Beach holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal Ontario Museum nor Historical Society of Long Beach holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal Ontario Museum nor Historical Society of Long Beach holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal Ontario Museum nor Historical Society of Long Beach holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal Ontario Museum nor Historical Society of Long Beach holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References