Comparison Overview

Royal University Hospital Foundation

VS

LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport

Royal University Hospital Foundation

103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, S7N 0W8, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ruhf.org

The Royal University Hospital Foundation supports Royal University Hospital — the epicentre of medical care, teaching, and research in Saskatchewan. Health care is a shared mission. We collaborate closely with our stakeholders to maximize RUH’s impact as our province’s largest teaching hospital. Through the power of donor generosity, we help fund advanced technology, innovative research and compassionate care that elevate health-care standards for everyone. Our goal is to reduce the need for out-of-province treatment and bring world-class medicine closer to home. By supporting the province’s most important medical centre, we strengthen health care accessibility for communities across Saskatchewan, ensuring every patient – no matter where they live – receives the care they deserve.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport

920 Pierremont Rd, Shreveport, LA 71106, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lsuhsfoundation.org

The LSU Health Sciences Foundation is a private 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation with the sole purpose of supporting LSU Health Shreveport. Often, there’s a difference between the way the state can use funds and the way a private nonprofit foundation can use funds. That is why it’s a good idea to donate to the Foundation; the faculty and staff at LSU Health Shreveport will benefit more, and more quickly, from gifts given to the Foundation. Our mission is to inspire donors to invest in LSU Health Shreveport and steward contributions toward its support.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-university-hospital-foundation.jpeg
Royal University Hospital Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lsu-health-sciences-foundation.jpeg
LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal University Hospital Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal University Hospital Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport in 2025.

Incident History — Royal University Hospital Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal University Hospital Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-university-hospital-foundation.jpeg
Royal University Hospital Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lsu-health-sciences-foundation.jpeg
LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Royal University Hospital Foundation company and LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Royal University Hospital Foundation company.

In the current year, LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport company and Royal University Hospital Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport company nor Royal University Hospital Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport company nor Royal University Hospital Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport company nor Royal University Hospital Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal University Hospital Foundation company nor LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal University Hospital Foundation nor LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Royal University Hospital Foundation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport company.

Royal University Hospital Foundation company employs more people globally than LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Royal University Hospital Foundation nor LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal University Hospital Foundation nor LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal University Hospital Foundation nor LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal University Hospital Foundation nor LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal University Hospital Foundation nor LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal University Hospital Foundation nor LSU Health Sciences Foundation-Shreveport holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References