Comparison Overview

Royal Printing Co., Inc.

VS

LandmarkPrint

Royal Printing Co., Inc.

3200 W. Sunset Rd., Las Vegas, NV, 89118, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.royalprinting.com

If your business deserves an experienced printing partner you can depend on, call and discover the difference Royal can make for your bottom line. Located in one of the fastest moving cities in the world, we understand the importance of meeting deadlines without sacrificing quality. Excellent client communication from dedicated customer service advisors, attention to detail, efficient work flows and two production shifts assure you quality printing and on-time delivery.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

LandmarkPrint

375 Fairfield Avenue, Stamford, CT, 06902, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.landmarkprint.com

LandmarkPrint provides integrated digital print production services, promotional signage, and displays to customers in New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey. We offer cost-effective solutions and innovative approaches to communicating your brand, products, and services. But just as important, we work to understand your business goals, the challenges you face, and anticipate your needs. We make it easier for you to do business. Our experienced team of professionals helps customers achieve maximum impact on a project-by-project basis through Digital Printing, Large Format Graphics & Displays, Personalized Direct Mail and Fulfillment Services, Online Ordering, and National Distribution. Our customers - nationally and internationally renowned marketers - attest to our value as problem-solvers, logjam-breakers, and creative thinkers. LandmarkPrint has been consistently ranked in the “Top 25” nationally for digital print production companies for almost 35 years. We are the largest print service provider in southern Fairfield County. Thank you for visiting our company page. We look forward to hearing from you!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-printing-co.-inc..jpeg
Royal Printing Co., Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmark-print.jpeg
LandmarkPrint
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal Printing Co., Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LandmarkPrint
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Printing Co., Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LandmarkPrint in 2025.

Incident History — Royal Printing Co., Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Printing Co., Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LandmarkPrint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LandmarkPrint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-printing-co.-inc..jpeg
Royal Printing Co., Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmark-print.jpeg
LandmarkPrint
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Royal Printing Co., Inc. company and LandmarkPrint company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, LandmarkPrint company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Royal Printing Co., Inc. company.

In the current year, LandmarkPrint company and Royal Printing Co., Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LandmarkPrint company nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LandmarkPrint company nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LandmarkPrint company nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. company nor LandmarkPrint company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. nor LandmarkPrint holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. company nor LandmarkPrint company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LandmarkPrint company employs more people globally than Royal Printing Co., Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. nor LandmarkPrint holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. nor LandmarkPrint holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. nor LandmarkPrint holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. nor LandmarkPrint holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. nor LandmarkPrint holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. nor LandmarkPrint holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References