Comparison Overview

Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh

VS

Salt 1to1 Inc.

Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Royal Print is a company that specializes in printing and embroidery. The business has been established by people who have a wealth of experience in printing & embroidery services. It’s located in Edinburgh but we would love to work in all over the country and we also provide online services. Our team consists of 4 people and together we have been printing on almost everything including clothes, mugs, bags and fun to traditional items for many years. Our motto is: Everyday items are a great printable area and we would love to focus on innovative and specific projects for both an individual and small to large businesses. We supply and print / Embroider T-Shirts, Hoodies, Onesies, Polo Shirts, Mugs, Mousemats, Promotional, Merchandise, Hen & Stag T-Shirts, Dye Sublimated Polo, Rugby and T-Shirts, Team Kits, Some Signage & much more.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Salt 1to1 Inc.

11221 John Wycliffe Blvd, Orlando, FL, 32832, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Salt 1to1, Inc. specializes in personalized communications. Historically, this has been in print, but we are currently expanding to include video, promotional products, with future expansions planned. Our focus has been to come along side ministry organizations (from individual missionaries to small local churches to large international ministries) and assist them in their communication efforts. Very strong in the areas of print and mail, direct mail campaigns, creative ideas to get your name and individual brand out to your partners, we offer a variety of methods to help you communicate more effectively with your ministry partners. Strategic alliances with vendors across the country mean that we can find the best source and outlet for your projects if we are unable to do it ourselves. This expansion gives us access to all forms of print, specialized operations (foiling, engraving, unusual bindery requirements, etc.). Printing is covered from paper to billboards, wearables, promotional products, specialty items.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-print-&-embroidery-edinburgh.jpeg
Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salt-1to1-inc..jpeg
Salt 1to1 Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Salt 1to1 Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Salt 1to1 Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Salt 1to1 Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Salt 1to1 Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-print-&-embroidery-edinburgh.jpeg
Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salt-1to1-inc..jpeg
Salt 1to1 Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Salt 1to1 Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Salt 1to1 Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company.

In the current year, Salt 1to1 Inc. company and Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Salt 1to1 Inc. company nor Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Salt 1to1 Inc. company nor Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Salt 1to1 Inc. company nor Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company nor Salt 1to1 Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company nor Salt 1to1 Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company and Salt 1to1 Inc. company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L