Comparison Overview

Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh

VS

Tenji Concepts

Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.royalprint.co.uk

Royal Print is a company that specializes in printing and embroidery. The business has been established by people who have a wealth of experience in printing & embroidery services. It’s located in Edinburgh but we would love to work in all over the country and we also provide online services. Our team consists of 4 people and together we have been printing on almost everything including clothes, mugs, bags and fun to traditional items for many years. Our motto is: Everyday items are a great printable area and we would love to focus on innovative and specific projects for both an individual and small to large businesses. We supply and print / Embroider T-Shirts, Hoodies, Onesies, Polo Shirts, Mugs, Mousemats, Promotional, Merchandise, Hen & Stag T-Shirts, Dye Sublimated Polo, Rugby and T-Shirts, Team Kits, Some Signage & much more.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tenji Concepts

1/1 Hovey Rd, Yatala, Queensland, 4207, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tenji.com.au

We are professional manufacturers of a range of unique Exhibition and Display products. Our FleXad brand of tension fabric displays is becoming the most preferred choice for amazing looking trade show stands that set up easily and efficiently. With all our products locally printed and manufactured here in our Brisbane factory, we can provide quality products at the fastest turnaround and most affordable prices.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-print-&-embroidery-edinburgh.jpeg
Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenji-concepts.jpeg
Tenji Concepts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tenji Concepts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tenji Concepts in 2025.

Incident History — Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tenji Concepts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tenji Concepts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-print-&-embroidery-edinburgh.jpeg
Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenji-concepts.jpeg
Tenji Concepts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tenji Concepts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tenji Concepts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company.

In the current year, Tenji Concepts company and Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tenji Concepts company nor Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tenji Concepts company nor Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tenji Concepts company nor Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company nor Tenji Concepts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Tenji Concepts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company nor Tenji Concepts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tenji Concepts company employs more people globally than Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Tenji Concepts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Tenji Concepts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Tenji Concepts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Tenji Concepts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Tenji Concepts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal Print & Embroidery Edinburgh nor Tenji Concepts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References