Comparison Overview

Royal Mail

VS

DHL Express Italy

Royal Mail

0, None, London, None, GB, EC1A 1AA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 600 and 649

At Royal Mail we connect companies, customers and communities across the UK, delivering a ‘one-price-goes-anywhere’ universal postal service to over 29 million addresses. As one of the UK's leading companies, we are focused on being recognised as the best delivery company in the UK and across Europe.

NAICS: 492
NAICS Definition: Couriers and Messengers
Employees: 35,266
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

DHL Express Italy

via Lombardia 2/A Loc Peschiera Borromeo, Milano 20068, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Presente in oltre 220 Paesi nel mondo con proprie sedi e persone, la nostra azienda è in grado di unire alla capillarità del network la conoscenza approfondita dei mercati locali, delle procedure doganali e delle caratteristiche di trasporto e distribuzione specifiche dei diversi Paesi. Ogni giorno in ogni luogo del mondo, offriamo servizi di trasporto personalizzabili in base alle specifiche esigenze delle imprese, dialoghiamo con gli Enti Doganali e gli attori del mercato per trovare soluzioni sempre più rapide, in grado di rispettare le scadenze anche nei luoghi più remoti e cerchiamo soluzioni per rendere il nostro lavoro sempre più sostenibile verso l'ambiente e la società. Nel processo di Internazionalizzazione, siamo il partner delle imprese che sviluppano il proprio business all'estero, supportando e facilitando le operazioni di esportazione ed importazione.

NAICS: 492
NAICS Definition: Couriers and Messengers
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-mail.jpeg
Royal Mail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dhl-express-italy.jpeg
DHL Express Italy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal Mail
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DHL Express Italy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Freight and Package Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

Royal Mail has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Freight and Package Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Express Italy in 2025.

Incident History — Royal Mail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Mail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DHL Express Italy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Express Italy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-mail.jpeg
Royal Mail
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Software Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dhl-express-italy.jpeg
DHL Express Italy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DHL Express Italy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Royal Mail company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Royal Mail company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas DHL Express Italy company has not reported any.

In the current year, Royal Mail company has reported more cyber incidents than DHL Express Italy company.

Royal Mail company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while DHL Express Italy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Royal Mail company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other DHL Express Italy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DHL Express Italy company nor Royal Mail company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal Mail company nor DHL Express Italy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal Mail nor DHL Express Italy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Royal Mail company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DHL Express Italy company.

Royal Mail company employs more people globally than DHL Express Italy company, reflecting its scale as a Freight and Package Transportation.

Neither Royal Mail nor DHL Express Italy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal Mail nor DHL Express Italy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal Mail nor DHL Express Italy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal Mail nor DHL Express Italy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal Mail nor DHL Express Italy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal Mail nor DHL Express Italy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H