Comparison Overview

Royal Enfield

VS

Volvo Group

Royal Enfield

Eicher Motors, #96, Sector 32,, Gurgaon, Haryana -, 122001, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.royalenfield.com/

The oldest motorcycle brand in continuous production, Royal Enfield made its first motorcycle in 1901. A division of Eicher Motors Limited, Royal Enfield has created the mid-sized motorcycle segment in India with its unique and distinctive modern classic bikes. Royal Enfield operates in 60+ countries across the world with more than 3000 retail touch points globally, 5 CKD units (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Nepal, & Thailand), 3 state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities based out of Chennai, India and two technical centers - in India and in the UK. Watch Royal Enfield's incredible journey here - https://youtu.be/UvR57lwJptk

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 17,284
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Volvo Group

Gropegårdsgatan 2, Göteborg, SE, 417 15
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 0 and 549
https://www.volvogroup.com

The Volvo Group is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of trucks, buses, construction equipment and marine and industrial engines. The Group also provides complete solutions for financing and service. The Volvo Group, with its headquarters in Gothenburg, employs about 100,000 people, has production facilities in 18 countries and sells its products in more than 190 markets.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 77,329
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-enfield.jpeg
Royal Enfield
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvo-group.jpeg
Volvo Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal Enfield
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Volvo Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Enfield in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Volvo Group has 400.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Royal Enfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Enfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Volvo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volvo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-enfield.jpeg
Royal Enfield
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvo-group.jpeg
Volvo Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial (ransomware)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: ransomware
Motivation: financial (ransomware)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: third-party vendor compromise
Motivation: financial (presumed, based on ransomware attack)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Royal Enfield company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Volvo Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Volvo Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Royal Enfield company has not reported any.

In the current year, Volvo Group company has reported more cyber incidents than Royal Enfield company.

Volvo Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Royal Enfield company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Volvo Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Royal Enfield company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Volvo Group company nor Royal Enfield company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal Enfield company nor Volvo Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Volvo Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Royal Enfield company nor Volvo Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Volvo Group company employs more people globally than Royal Enfield company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Volvo Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Volvo Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Volvo Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Volvo Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Volvo Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Volvo Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in itsourcecode Online Pet Shop Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /pet1/addcnp.php. This manipulation of the argument cnpname causes sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda AX9 22.03.01.46. This affects the function image_check of the component httpd. The manipulation results in use of weak hash. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.6
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A weakness has been identified in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/update_student.php. This manipulation of the argument stud_id causes sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/save_user.php. The manipulation of the argument firstname results in sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/update_user.php. The manipulation of the argument user_id leads to sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References