Comparison Overview

Royal Enfield

VS

Dana Incorporated

Royal Enfield

Eicher Motors, #96, Sector 32,, Gurgaon, Haryana -, 122001, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-17

The oldest motorcycle brand in continuous production, Royal Enfield made its first motorcycle in 1901. A division of Eicher Motors Limited, Royal Enfield has created the mid-sized motorcycle segment in India with its unique and distinctive modern classic bikes. Royal Enfield operates in 60+ countries across the world with more than 3000 retail touch points globally, 5 CKD units (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Nepal, & Thailand), 3 state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities based out of Chennai, India and two technical centers - in India and in the UK. Watch Royal Enfield's incredible journey here - https://youtu.be/UvR57lwJptk

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 17,284
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dana Incorporated

3939 Technology Drive, Maumee, Ohio, 43537, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

In a world of constant motion, life is about balance. At Dana, our balanced approach considers the people, products, and planet that sustain us all. For 120 years, we've been powering innovation to move our world. Today, over 40,000 Dana people, in more than 30 countries, advance drive and motion systems, thermal and sealing technologies, and power management innovations. Supporting traditional, hybrid, and EV manufacturers, wherever the road — or offroad — takes us. We're not just adapting to the future of mobility. We're shaping it. Headquartered in Maumee, Ohio, United States — Dana reported sales of $10.6 billion in 2023. We were named among the "World's Most Ethical Companies 2024” by Ethisphere and as one of "America's Most Responsible Companies 2023" by Newsweek. We’re always looking for talented people to join the Dana team. For more, please visit https://jobs.dana.com.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 16,421
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-enfield.jpeg
Royal Enfield
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dana-incorporated.jpeg
Dana Incorporated
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal Enfield
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dana Incorporated
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Enfield in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dana Incorporated in 2025.

Incident History — Royal Enfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Enfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dana Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dana Incorporated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-enfield.jpeg
Royal Enfield
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dana-incorporated.jpeg
Dana Incorporated
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Royal Enfield company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dana Incorporated company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dana Incorporated company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Royal Enfield company.

In the current year, Dana Incorporated company and Royal Enfield company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dana Incorporated company nor Royal Enfield company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dana Incorporated company nor Royal Enfield company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dana Incorporated company nor Royal Enfield company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal Enfield company nor Dana Incorporated company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Dana Incorporated holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Dana Incorporated company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Royal Enfield company.

Royal Enfield company employs more people globally than Dana Incorporated company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Dana Incorporated holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Dana Incorporated holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Dana Incorporated holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Dana Incorporated holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Dana Incorporated holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal Enfield nor Dana Incorporated holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N