Comparison Overview

Roxor Gaming

VS

Eldorado Resorts, Inc.

Roxor Gaming

25 Golden Square, London, England, W1F 9LS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Roxor Gaming was formed in September 2019 as a B2B content supplier. We may seem relatively new to the industry, but Roxor Gaming has built casino content for over 20 years as part of Gamesys (a Ballys’ Corporation Company). As a result, we already have the history, the scale, and market-leading brands. We enjoy entertaining but consider ourselves more than just an average games provider! Our ecosystem makes our games quite simply the most rewarding available in the market today. Thanks to our strong heritage, we have a unique understanding of what makes a great player experience.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Eldorado Resorts, Inc.

100 West Liberty Street, Reno, Nevada, 89501, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Caesars Entertainment joins two successful gaming leaders, Caesars Entertainment and Eldorado Resorts, who have come together to create the largest and most diversified collection of destinations across the U.S. Boasting many of the world’s most prestigious gaming brands, including Caesars Palace®, Harrah’s®, Horseshoe®, Eldorado®, Silver Legacy®, Circus Circus® Reno and Tropicana®, among many others, we are the global leader in gaming and hospitality. While each of our over 55 world-class resorts offer its own unique amenities, all share a common goal of providing unparalleled family-style service and exhilarating experiences. Your Empire awaits.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 245
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roxor-gaming.jpeg
Roxor Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eldorado-resorts-inc-.jpeg
Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Roxor Gaming
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roxor Gaming in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eldorado Resorts, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Roxor Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roxor Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eldorado Resorts, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roxor-gaming.jpeg
Roxor Gaming
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Zero-day vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eldorado-resorts-inc-.jpeg
Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Attack on IT support vendor
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party IT vendor breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Roxor Gaming company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Roxor Gaming company.

In the current year, Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company and Roxor Gaming company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company nor Roxor Gaming company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Roxor Gaming company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Roxor Gaming company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Roxor Gaming company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Roxor Gaming nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Roxor Gaming company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company employs more people globally than Roxor Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Roxor Gaming nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Roxor Gaming nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Roxor Gaming nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Roxor Gaming nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Roxor Gaming nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Roxor Gaming nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.