Comparison Overview

Rowland Reading Foundation

VS

F.A. Davis

Rowland Reading Foundation

6120 University Ave., Middleton, 53562, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Rowland Reading Foundation is a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving reading instruction in the primary grades. The Foundation publishes Superkids, a phonics-based core reading program just for kindergarten through second grade that integrates all the language arts. Superkids combines rigorous instruction with highly motivating materials and has achieved exceptional results in schools throughout the United States. The Foundation also provides teachers the training they need to implement the program most effectively—and gives students the strong instruction they deserve.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

F.A. Davis

1915 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Headquartered in Philadelphia, the city of its founding in 1879, F.A. Davis is an independent, family-owned publisher of teaching and learning solutions for nursing and the health sciences. From flagship titles like Taber’s Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary to online, adaptive platforms like Davis Advantage and Medical Language Lab, the company is dedicated to developing innovative products empowered by the technology that is changing how students are learning, instructors are teaching, and professionals are practicing. The breadth and depth of print, digital, and online resources across disciplines and specialties is a firm foundation on which to meet the challenges of the future.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 577
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rowland-reading-foundation.jpeg
Rowland Reading Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/f-a--davis-company.jpeg
F.A. Davis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rowland Reading Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
F.A. Davis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rowland Reading Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for F.A. Davis in 2025.

Incident History — Rowland Reading Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rowland Reading Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — F.A. Davis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

F.A. Davis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rowland-reading-foundation.jpeg
Rowland Reading Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/f-a--davis-company.jpeg
F.A. Davis
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

F.A. Davis company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rowland Reading Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, F.A. Davis company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rowland Reading Foundation company.

In the current year, F.A. Davis company and Rowland Reading Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither F.A. Davis company nor Rowland Reading Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither F.A. Davis company nor Rowland Reading Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither F.A. Davis company nor Rowland Reading Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation company nor F.A. Davis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation nor F.A. Davis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation company nor F.A. Davis company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

F.A. Davis company employs more people globally than Rowland Reading Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation nor F.A. Davis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation nor F.A. Davis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation nor F.A. Davis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation nor F.A. Davis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation nor F.A. Davis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation nor F.A. Davis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.