Comparison Overview

Route Reports

VS

TotalVerify

Route Reports

undefined, London, London, SE19PG, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Route Reports is a technology supplier that provides transport operators with cost-effective and cutting-edge solutions to improve the maintenance and operation of road and rail transport networks. We achieve this through the use of innovative hardware and software that is tailored for use in the transport industry, ultimately enhancing operatorsโ€™ understanding of where infrastructure defects might become an obstacle to their operations - before they do. The end result is more punctual, more comfortable and more affordable journeys on roads and rail.

NAICS: 518
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TotalVerify

Last Update: 2024-06-29 (UTC)

Excellent

The TotalVerifyโ„ข data hub from Equifax offers differentiated data and unique datasets through verification, investigation, and monitoring solutions. Our broad solution set can help deliver the information you need to build trust, enable safety, verify information, and/or assess people-based risk. When you are tasked with life-impacting and business-altering work, confidence is critical. Get valuable insights about how the power of data can help reduce potential business and community risk for lenders, employers, and social service agencies. Follow us to stay up to date on industry news and discover the digital efficiencies that come from fast, secure data solutions.

NAICS: 518
NAICS Definition: Data Processing, Hosting and Related Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/route-reports.jpeg
Route Reports
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalverify.jpeg
TotalVerify
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Route Reports
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TotalVerify
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Data Infrastructure and Analytics Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Route Reports in 2025.

Incidents vs Data Infrastructure and Analytics Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TotalVerify in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Route Reports (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Route Reports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” TotalVerify (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TotalVerify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/route-reports.jpeg
Route Reports
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalverify.jpeg
TotalVerify
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain, Fraud
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: AI-Orchestrated Attack
Motivation: Research Study
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unknown (historical breach; data sold on dark web)
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Route Reports company and TotalVerify company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

TotalVerify company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Route Reports company has not reported any.

In the current year, TotalVerify company has reported more cyber incidents than Route Reports company.

Neither TotalVerify company nor Route Reports company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

TotalVerify company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Route Reports company has not reported such incidents publicly.

TotalVerify company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Route Reports company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Route Reports company nor TotalVerify company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

TotalVerify company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Route Reports company.

Route Reports company employs more people globally than TotalVerify company, reflecting its scale as a Data Infrastructure and Analytics.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. The affected element is the function elf_swap_shdr in the library bfd/elfcode.h of the component Linker. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack must be carried out locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 9ca499644a21ceb3f946d1c179c38a83be084490. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. Impacted is the function _bfd_elf_parse_eh_frame of the file bfd/elf-eh-frame.c of the component Linker. Executing manipulation can lead to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack is restricted to local execution. The exploit has been published and may be used. This patch is called ea1a0737c7692737a644af0486b71e4a392cbca8. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in GNU Binutils 2.45. This issue affects the function dump_dwarf_section of the file binutils/objdump.c. Performing manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. The attack is only possible with local access. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named f87a66db645caf8cc0e6fc87b0c28c78a38af59b. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.7
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in zhuimengshaonian wisdom-education up to 1.0.4. This vulnerability affects the function selectStudentExamInfoList of the file src/main/java/com/education/api/controller/student/ExamInfoController.java. Such manipulation of the argument subjectId leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Campcodes Farm Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation results in file and directory information exposure. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X