Comparison Overview

Ross Strategic

VS

ACLU of Ohio

Ross Strategic

1325 4th Ave, Seattle, Washington, 98101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Ross Strategic is a small mission-driven company of approximately 45 employees. We seek to contribute to advancing innovative solutions to pressing environmental and social challenges in the U.S. and around the world through strategy and program development, collaborative process support, and monitoring, evaluation, and learning services. We provide employees a casual work environment and opportunities for growth. We have transitioned to being a remote company, with clusters of staff in Washington State (Seattle and Olympia), Texas (Austin and Dallas), Oregon (Bend), and California (Los Angeles). We have office space in some of these locations, and we are evolving to bring remote employees together for in-person interaction at periodic cadence throughout the year. Our management actively supports staff work-life balance. Employees enjoy remote work arrangements, flexible scheduling, and control of how they use their paid time off. Ross Strategic employees are given a lot of freedom and responsibility to manage their work.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ACLU of Ohio

4506 Chester Avenue, None, Cleveland, OH, US, 44103
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The ACLU works daily in the courts and in our communities to defend the individual rights guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States. We deal with issues like freedom of speech, censorship, due process, the right to privacy, discrimination, separation of church and state, search and seizure, and voting rights.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ross-strategic.jpeg
Ross Strategic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-civil-liberties-union-of-ohio.jpeg
ACLU of Ohio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ross Strategic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ACLU of Ohio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ross Strategic in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ACLU of Ohio in 2025.

Incident History — Ross Strategic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ross Strategic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ACLU of Ohio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACLU of Ohio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ross-strategic.jpeg
Ross Strategic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-civil-liberties-union-of-ohio.jpeg
ACLU of Ohio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ross Strategic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ACLU of Ohio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ACLU of Ohio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ross Strategic company.

In the current year, ACLU of Ohio company and Ross Strategic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ACLU of Ohio company nor Ross Strategic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ACLU of Ohio company nor Ross Strategic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ACLU of Ohio company nor Ross Strategic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ross Strategic company nor ACLU of Ohio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ross Strategic nor ACLU of Ohio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ross Strategic company nor ACLU of Ohio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ross Strategic company employs more people globally than ACLU of Ohio company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Ross Strategic nor ACLU of Ohio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ross Strategic nor ACLU of Ohio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ross Strategic nor ACLU of Ohio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ross Strategic nor ACLU of Ohio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ross Strategic nor ACLU of Ohio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ross Strategic nor ACLU of Ohio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H