Comparison Overview

Ross Stores, Inc.

VS

Inditex

Ross Stores, Inc.

5130 Hacienda Drive, Dublin, CA, US, 94568
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849

For the last 40+ years, Ross Stores, Inc. has grown from a six-store chain into an $21.1 billion, Fortune 500 Company. We operate our off-price businesses in a way that keeps costs low so we can pass the savings to our customers. We continue to open new stores and our sales growth has outpaced traditional retailers for the past three years. Ross Dress for Less® has 1,847 stores in 44 states, the District of Columbia and Guam. dd’s DISCOUNTS® has 358 stores in 22 states. Please join our Talent Community to receive the latest updates for your areas of interest, career news, and exciting opportunities at Ross Stores: https://ross.avature.net/talentcommunity Additional information is available at: www.rossstores.com www.ddsdiscounts.com

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 39,547
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Inditex

Avda. de la Diputación s/n, Arteixo, A Coruña, ES, 15143
Last Update: 2025-11-27

What is Inditex? Inditex comprises seven brands: Zara, Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius, Oysho and Zara Home. We sell in 213 markets through our online platforms and our over 5.800 stores. But… What is Inditex? We are the clothes you choose to wear, the products with which you decorate your home, or celebrate a special occasion. You choose us. We are decisive. We trust in the ability and instincts of our professional team. We have got to where we are today thanks to them and the hard work of those people who have shown us where we can improve. We reinvent ourselves, we correct our mistakes and we keep moving forward. We react. #morethanajob

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 50,436
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ross-stores.jpeg
Ross Stores, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inditex.jpeg
Inditex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ross Stores, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Inditex
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ross Stores, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inditex in 2025.

Incident History — Ross Stores, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ross Stores, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Inditex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inditex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ross-stores.jpeg
Ross Stores, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inditex.jpeg
Inditex
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Inditex company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ross Stores, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Inditex company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ross Stores, Inc. company.

In the current year, Inditex company and Ross Stores, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Inditex company nor Ross Stores, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Inditex company nor Ross Stores, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Inditex company nor Ross Stores, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ross Stores, Inc. company nor Inditex company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ross Stores, Inc. nor Inditex holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Inditex company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ross Stores, Inc. company.

Inditex company employs more people globally than Ross Stores, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Ross Stores, Inc. nor Inditex holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ross Stores, Inc. nor Inditex holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ross Stores, Inc. nor Inditex holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ross Stores, Inc. nor Inditex holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ross Stores, Inc. nor Inditex holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ross Stores, Inc. nor Inditex holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H