Comparison Overview

ROSS Intelligence

VS

Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc.

ROSS Intelligence

650 California St, San Francisco, California, 94108, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Founded in 2014, ROSS Intelligence has become a global leader in artificial intelligence solution for Legal Technologies. Using cutting edge Natural Language Processing (NLP), our technology is able to accurately determine the answer to your legal research questions in seconds. Accurate results in less time deliver better research to you.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc.

735 North Water Street, Suite M185, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Brown & Jones Reporting, established in 1987, provides certified court reporters and certified legal videographers for the State of Wisconsin. Clients rely on us for our commitment to excellence and the personal attention that distinguishes our court reporting services. The professionalism that distinguishes Brown & Jones extends to our complimentary conference facilities, which are available to clients at our downtown Milwaukee office. The light-filled spaces accommodate from 6 to 20 with state-of-the-art technology. Clients are welcome to reserve these rooms for meetings, depositions and videoconferences in conjunction with our court reporting services. Supported by our full-service office and personalized hospitality, Brown & Jones'​ conference center is ready to be your Wisconsin Deposition Headquarters.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ross-inc.jpeg
ROSS Intelligence
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-&-jones-reporting-inc-.jpeg
Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ROSS Intelligence
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ROSS Intelligence in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — ROSS Intelligence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ROSS Intelligence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ross-inc.jpeg
ROSS Intelligence
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-&-jones-reporting-inc-.jpeg
Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ROSS Intelligence company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ROSS Intelligence company.

In the current year, Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. company and ROSS Intelligence company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. company nor ROSS Intelligence company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. company nor ROSS Intelligence company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. company nor ROSS Intelligence company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ROSS Intelligence company nor Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ROSS Intelligence nor Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ROSS Intelligence company nor Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. company employs more people globally than ROSS Intelligence company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither ROSS Intelligence nor Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ROSS Intelligence nor Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ROSS Intelligence nor Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ROSS Intelligence nor Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ROSS Intelligence nor Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ROSS Intelligence nor Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X