Comparison Overview

Rosh Review

VS

Squla

Rosh Review

P.O. Box 7021, Huntington Woods, MI, 48070, US
Last Update: 2025-12-06
Between 750 and 799

Rosh Review is the leading global provider of educational content, online learning tools, and data analytics for physicians, PAs and nurse practitioners as well as program development and management. Combining unmatched expertise in developing high-yield content and custom teaching images in a simple and user-friendly interface, Rosh Review works at the intersection of technology and education to help individuals reach their goals and achieve their dreams.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Squla

Rhijnspoorplein 22, Amsterdam, 1018 TX, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Squla is an online educational learning platform that helps kids to learn in a fun way. Squla offers an amazingly fun and educational learning program and features thousands of interactive games, quizzes and activities with multiple subjects! The Squla crew is a dynamic team that is enthusiastic about creating a fun, new way of learning in this ever-evolving digital age. Our team represents various backgrounds and nationalities. We have a positive, energetic, informal work environment where teamwork is the key to create high quality products. Everything you see is made ​in-house by our own people: this makes Squla unique. Everyone who works here contributes to a new and fun way of learning which will meet today's online world!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rosh-review-llc.jpeg
Rosh Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/squla.jpeg
Squla
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rosh Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Squla
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rosh Review in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Squla in 2025.

Incident History — Rosh Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rosh Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Squla (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Squla cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rosh-review-llc.jpeg
Rosh Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/squla.jpeg
Squla
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rosh Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Squla company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Squla company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rosh Review company.

In the current year, Squla company and Rosh Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Squla company nor Rosh Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Squla company nor Rosh Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Squla company nor Rosh Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rosh Review company nor Squla company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rosh Review nor Squla holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rosh Review company nor Squla company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rosh Review company employs more people globally than Squla company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither Rosh Review nor Squla holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rosh Review nor Squla holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rosh Review nor Squla holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rosh Review nor Squla holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rosh Review nor Squla holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rosh Review nor Squla holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X