Comparison Overview

Rose Legal, PLLC

VS

County Cost Consultants

Rose Legal, PLLC

519 W State Street , Pleasant Grove, 84062, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Rose Legal is a law firm handling exclusively workers' compensation cases for the injured workers. We specialize in getting injured workers the benefits they are entitled to and help get their life back after an injury at work. We cover the entire state of Utah. Our new office is conveniently located in Pleasant Grove, Utah. Free consultation and our fees are contingency only - you don't pay us until we get you paid! 801-810-7673. With over eight years of experience in workers' compensation, Tim Rose helps guide injured workers through the process of contesting their denied claims. For three years in a row, Tim Rose has been selected by Super Lawyers as a “Rising Star," an award for the top 2.5% of lawyers in each field. He is rated "Excellent" by Avvo, the online legal marketplace, and is a member of the Utah Association for Justice and its Legislative Committee.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

County Cost Consultants

County Cost Consultants Ltd, Liverpool, Merseyside, L2 3PF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Based in Liverpool, Merseyside with a client base throughout the UK, County Cost Consultants have been helping our clients with their legal costs since 2000. Led by Alex Clapp and Ged Brew, our company has established itself as one of the leading exponents of legal cost consulting in the country. We have achieved this by offering a professional, commercially focused approach to our work, and, while expanding our operations, we have never lost track of the importance of offering a personal service. County Cost Consultants has assembled one of the most knowledgeable and experienced team of law cost draftsmen and law cost negotiators in the industry. Each team member deals with cases individually, including the two directors, and have an extensive understanding of the legal costs industry, having undergone rigorous in-house training combined with many years’ worth of experience. The company has evolved into a full-service cost consultancy, offering both claimant and defendant services to solicitors/insurers both locally and nationally. We are able to take on difficult cases and pride ourselves on delivering a complete service, looking after every aspect of a case from initial enquiries through to full resolution. County Cost Consultants has built up a loyal client base, many of whom have been with us since the beginning, and we have a retention rate of around 85%. We have a fantastic working relationship with our clients based on trusting, honest advice, and have become a valuable point of reference for changes in the industry. To start your relationship with County Cost Consultants, call 0844 579 6885 today.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roselegal.jpeg
Rose Legal, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/county-cost-consultants.jpeg
County Cost Consultants
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rose Legal, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
County Cost Consultants
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rose Legal, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for County Cost Consultants in 2025.

Incident History — Rose Legal, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rose Legal, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — County Cost Consultants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

County Cost Consultants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roselegal.jpeg
Rose Legal, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/county-cost-consultants.jpeg
County Cost Consultants
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rose Legal, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to County Cost Consultants company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, County Cost Consultants company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rose Legal, PLLC company.

In the current year, County Cost Consultants company and Rose Legal, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither County Cost Consultants company nor Rose Legal, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither County Cost Consultants company nor Rose Legal, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither County Cost Consultants company nor Rose Legal, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rose Legal, PLLC company nor County Cost Consultants company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rose Legal, PLLC nor County Cost Consultants holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rose Legal, PLLC company nor County Cost Consultants company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

County Cost Consultants company employs more people globally than Rose Legal, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Rose Legal, PLLC nor County Cost Consultants holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rose Legal, PLLC nor County Cost Consultants holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rose Legal, PLLC nor County Cost Consultants holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rose Legal, PLLC nor County Cost Consultants holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rose Legal, PLLC nor County Cost Consultants holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rose Legal, PLLC nor County Cost Consultants holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X