Comparison Overview

Ropatent

VS

Matthew Charles Law

Ropatent

8 Teodor Stefanescu Street, Bucharest, RO
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We believe that our significant experience in intellectual property acquired in the State Office for Inventions and Trademarks (OSIM), famous law firms and industrial property advice offices in Romania, we recommend to provide technical and legal advice and representation to ensure and respect intellectual property rights. Our team of attorneys, counselors/patent attorneys in industrial property, entitled to representation at the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM), the European Patent Office (EPO) and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), engineers and chemists, with a continuous and thorough professional training. Our company can offer you a full range of services for trademarks, patents, utility models, know-how, technology transfer, designs, copyright and related rights, internet domains, counterfeit and rights infringement, at very eligible prices and following strict deadlines.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Matthew Charles Law

210 North Columbia, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Matthew Charles Law offers high quality and affordable legal services. The firm's practice includes criminal defense, civil litigation, business law, and more. Founded in 2009, the firm has office locations in Durham and Chapel Hill. It serves clients throughout the triangle region of North Carolina and is actively involved in the region's communities.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ropatent.jpeg
Ropatent
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/matthew-charles-law.jpeg
Matthew Charles Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ropatent
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Matthew Charles Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ropatent in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Matthew Charles Law in 2025.

Incident History — Ropatent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ropatent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Matthew Charles Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Matthew Charles Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ropatent.jpeg
Ropatent
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/matthew-charles-law.jpeg
Matthew Charles Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ropatent company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Matthew Charles Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Matthew Charles Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ropatent company.

In the current year, Matthew Charles Law company and Ropatent company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Matthew Charles Law company nor Ropatent company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Matthew Charles Law company nor Ropatent company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Matthew Charles Law company nor Ropatent company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ropatent company nor Matthew Charles Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ropatent nor Matthew Charles Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ropatent company nor Matthew Charles Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Matthew Charles Law company employs more people globally than Ropatent company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Ropatent nor Matthew Charles Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ropatent nor Matthew Charles Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ropatent nor Matthew Charles Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ropatent nor Matthew Charles Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ropatent nor Matthew Charles Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ropatent nor Matthew Charles Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X