Comparison Overview

Roosevelt Institute

VS

University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs

Roosevelt Institute

570 Lexington Ave, 5th Floor, New York, NY, US, 10022
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Roosevelt Institute, a New York-based think tank, promotes bold policy reforms that would redefine the American economy and our democracy. With a focus on curbing corporate power and reclaiming public power, Roosevelt is helping people understand that the economy is shaped by choices—via institutions and the rules that structure markets—while also exploring the economics of race and gender and the changing 21st-century economy. Roosevelt is armed with a transformative vision for the future, working to move the country toward a new economic and political system: one built by many for the good of all. We bring together thousands of thinkers and doers—from a new generation of leaders in every state to Nobel laureate economists working to redefine the rules that guide our social and economic realities. We rethink and reshape everything from local policy to federal legislation, orienting toward a new economic and political system: one built by many for the good of all.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 161
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs

1380 Lawrence Street, Denver, CO, 80204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

There is a reason U.S.News & World Report ranks the CU Denver School of Public Affairs as the top public affairs school in Colorado, and among the best in the nation. Our world-class faculty and our location in the heart of Colorado’s capital create countless opportunities for experiential learning. Combine this with our rigorous programs and flexible class schedules, and the result is a student body united in its vision for a better world and equipped with the practical skills to make it happen. When our students graduate, they’re not just ready to start making an impact: they’ve already begun. Thousands of our graduates work in management, leadership and policy analysis positions in government and nonprofit organizations -- in Colorado, across the country, and around the globe. We offer five degree programs: a doctorate in public affairs, a master of public administration, a master of criminal justice, a bachelor of arts in criminal justice, and a bachelor of arts in public service. To meet the needs of today’s busy students, we offer a variety of in-person and online courses in both traditional and accelerated program formats. Our renowned research and teaching faculty is strengthened by a number of prominent practitioners whose professional experience contributes significantly to our learning environment. The CU Denver School of Public Affairs: where visionary leaders find their point of view.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roosevelt-institute.jpeg
Roosevelt Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-colorado-denver-school-of-public-affairs.jpeg
University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Roosevelt Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roosevelt Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs in 2025.

Incident History — Roosevelt Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roosevelt Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roosevelt-institute.jpeg
Roosevelt Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-colorado-denver-school-of-public-affairs.jpeg
University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Roosevelt Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Roosevelt Institute company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs company and Roosevelt Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs company nor Roosevelt Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Roosevelt Institute company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs company nor Roosevelt Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Roosevelt Institute company nor University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Roosevelt Institute nor University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Roosevelt Institute company.

Roosevelt Institute company employs more people globally than University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Roosevelt Institute nor University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Roosevelt Institute nor University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Roosevelt Institute nor University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Roosevelt Institute nor University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Roosevelt Institute nor University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Roosevelt Institute nor University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H