Comparison Overview

Roopop Design

VS

Rotterdam Vormgeving

Roopop Design

Brighton, East Sussex BN3 8JJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Roopop Design is a small independent graphic design studio based in Colchester. With experience in Commercial Design & Print, Publishing, Music Design and Web Design, we are committed to delivering professional, creative visual solutions with a personal touch, which generates results for you and your business. We make a positive difference to how you are perceived by your customers in the market place whilst offering you the best design solutions to suit your budget. From concept to completion, we work passionately to produce strong design, which has personality, and originality making sure you get noticed and stand out from your competitors.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rotterdam Vormgeving

Europalaan 2B Utrecht, 3526 KS, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Rotterdam Vormgeving: grafische vormgeving, communicatie & concept visualisatie met oog en oor voor de wensen van de klant. Uit Utrecht! Mijn specialisatie is no-nonsense vormgeving met inhoud. Met oog en oor voor de wensen van de klant. Naast grafische vormgeving voor drukwerk behoren fotografie en webdesign ook tot de mogelijkheden. Het vertalen van complexe materie naar een helder beeld is één van mijn kwaliteiten. En, voor mij geldt dat de vorm altijd de inhoud moet ondersteunen en niet andersom. In de afgelopen jaren maakte ik: advertenties, concept visualisatie, dissertaties, factsheets, foto’s, flyers, infographics, logo’s, magazines, PowerPoint presentaties, productbladen, websites, wetenschappelijke posters en nog veel meer.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roopop-design.jpeg
Roopop Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rotterdam-vormgeving.jpeg
Rotterdam Vormgeving
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Roopop Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rotterdam Vormgeving
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roopop Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rotterdam Vormgeving in 2025.

Incident History — Roopop Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roopop Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rotterdam Vormgeving (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rotterdam Vormgeving cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roopop-design.jpeg
Roopop Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rotterdam-vormgeving.jpeg
Rotterdam Vormgeving
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rotterdam Vormgeving company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Roopop Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rotterdam Vormgeving company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Roopop Design company.

In the current year, Rotterdam Vormgeving company and Roopop Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rotterdam Vormgeving company nor Roopop Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rotterdam Vormgeving company nor Roopop Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rotterdam Vormgeving company nor Roopop Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Roopop Design company nor Rotterdam Vormgeving company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Roopop Design nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Roopop Design company nor Rotterdam Vormgeving company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Roopop Design company and Rotterdam Vormgeving company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Roopop Design nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Roopop Design nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Roopop Design nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Roopop Design nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Roopop Design nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Roopop Design nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X