Comparison Overview

RoomMates Decor

VS

Cadbury Adams

RoomMates Decor

750 Linden Ave, York, PA, 17404, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Established in 2006 as a division of York Wallcoverings, RoomMates Decor is the largest manufacturer of wall decals and decorative peel & stick products in North America. What originally started with a handful of wallpaper cutouts and stickers designed to match existing designs has quickly grown into a huge product catalog that includes wall stickers, wall panels, wallpapers, murals, and more!

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cadbury Adams

Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Cadbury Adams USA has it all wrapped up -- in thin little rectangles wrapped in foil. The US division of British candy giant Cadbury makes candy, chewing gum, and mints. Its brands include Bubblicious, Certs, Chiclets, Dentyne, HALLS, Sour Patch, Swedish Fish, and Trident. The company also makes retro gum brands Beeman's, Blackjack, and Clove, which it reintroduces every few years. Cadbury Adams USA was formed after then Cadbury Schweppes bought the Adams chewing gum brands from Pfizer for $4.2 billion in 2003 and integrated it into its already existing US operations. (Cadbury Schweppes spun-off its beverage operations to focus solely on candy in 2008.)

NAICS: 339
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roommatesdecor.jpeg
RoomMates Decor
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cadbury-adams.jpeg
Cadbury Adams
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
RoomMates Decor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cadbury Adams
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RoomMates Decor in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cadbury Adams in 2025.

Incident History โ€” RoomMates Decor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RoomMates Decor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Cadbury Adams (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cadbury Adams cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roommatesdecor.jpeg
RoomMates Decor
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cadbury-adams.jpeg
Cadbury Adams
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cadbury Adams company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to RoomMates Decor company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cadbury Adams company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RoomMates Decor company.

In the current year, Cadbury Adams company and RoomMates Decor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cadbury Adams company nor RoomMates Decor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cadbury Adams company nor RoomMates Decor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cadbury Adams company nor RoomMates Decor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RoomMates Decor company nor Cadbury Adams company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

RoomMates Decor company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cadbury Adams company.

Neither RoomMates Decor company nor Cadbury Adams company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy. Envoy versions earlier than 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, and 1.33.12 contain a use-after-free vulnerability in the Lua filter. When a Lua script executing in the response phase rewrites a response body so that its size exceeds the configured per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (default 1MB), Envoy generates a local reply whose headers override the original response headers, leaving dangling references and causing a crash. This results in denial of service. Updating to versions 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, or 1.33.12 fixes the issue. Increasing per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (and for HTTP/2 the initial_stream_window_size) or increasing per_request_buffer_limit_bytes / request_body_buffer_limit can reduce the likelihood of triggering the condition but does not correct the underlying memory safety flaw.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in a CMap, via the "UseCMap" entry, leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a credential leakage which could allow an attacker to access other computers or applications.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N