Comparison Overview

Romore Associates

VS

FactorySense RFID

Romore Associates

Liberty Street, Manchester, NH, 03104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.romore.com

Through excellent customer service, state-of-the-art technology, creative vantage points and our strategic alliances, our goal is to help you meet your goals! Please explore and enjoy our site, check out our Products and Services page for more information on what we provide, view some of the client sites that we have produced.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

FactorySense RFID

2035 Central Circle, McKinney, Texas, 75069, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
https://www.getfactorysense.com

FactorySense empowers companies with automated solutions that reduce costs, streamline business processes, and bring together disparate components into a simplified all-in-one RFID solution. This allows companies to track their most valuable and sensitive assets more efficiently and effectively, while also reducing waste through lost productivity, assets, and capacity. We provide the internal location intelligence necessary for companies to go from chaos to order and create a more positive work environment for employees. Our goal is to make an impactful, innovative difference in how companies operate and function today.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/romore-associates.jpeg
Romore Associates
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/factorysense.jpeg
FactorySense RFID
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Romore Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FactorySense RFID
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Romore Associates in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FactorySense RFID in 2025.

Incident History — Romore Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Romore Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FactorySense RFID (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FactorySense RFID cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/romore-associates.jpeg
Romore Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/factorysense.jpeg
FactorySense RFID
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Romore Associates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FactorySense RFID company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FactorySense RFID company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Romore Associates company.

In the current year, FactorySense RFID company and Romore Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FactorySense RFID company nor Romore Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FactorySense RFID company nor Romore Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FactorySense RFID company nor Romore Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Romore Associates company nor FactorySense RFID company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Romore Associates nor FactorySense RFID holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Romore Associates company nor FactorySense RFID company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FactorySense RFID company employs more people globally than Romore Associates company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Romore Associates nor FactorySense RFID holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Romore Associates nor FactorySense RFID holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Romore Associates nor FactorySense RFID holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Romore Associates nor FactorySense RFID holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Romore Associates nor FactorySense RFID holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Romore Associates nor FactorySense RFID holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References