Comparison Overview

Romanian Center for European Policies

VS

TechFreedom

Romanian Center for European Policies

Gheorghe Pop de Basesti 43-45, Bucharest, 010615, RO
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Romanian Center for European Policies (CRPE) was established in 2009 by a group of experts bound by the shared objective of supporting Romania's role in Europe. The mission of the CRPE is to promote Romania as an influential leader in the development of EU agendas and policies. Another mission is to advance the Europeanization processes in Romania by providing expertise in various fields and by initiating or participating in public debates.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TechFreedom

110 Maryland Ave NE, Washington, DC 20002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

TechFreedom, launched in 2011, digs deep into the hard policy and legal questions raised by technological change. We’re bullish on the future: for the most part, it’ll be great—if we let it. If those in power can resist the all-too-natural impulse for stability and control. The future isn’t a place we can design, it’s an ongoing, never-ending process of trial-and-error. In general, we’re for letting that process play out. Of course, it’ll be messy; it always has been. There will be real problems to confront; there always have been. But there are no tidy, top-down “solutions,” only adaptation, evolution, and policy frameworks that are better and worse at encouraging both. Crafting those frameworks is what we do. TechFreedom tries to write simple rules for a complex world—rules that focus on clear harms; rules can change and evolve over time; rules that leave people free to tinker, innovate and experiment; rules that unleash ingenuity rather than trying to direct it. In short, we teach policymakers how to be friends, not enemies, of the future.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/romanian-center-for-european-policies.jpeg
Romanian Center for European Policies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/techfreedom.jpeg
TechFreedom
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Romanian Center for European Policies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TechFreedom
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Romanian Center for European Policies in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TechFreedom in 2025.

Incident History — Romanian Center for European Policies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Romanian Center for European Policies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TechFreedom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TechFreedom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/romanian-center-for-european-policies.jpeg
Romanian Center for European Policies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/techfreedom.jpeg
TechFreedom
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Romanian Center for European Policies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TechFreedom company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TechFreedom company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Romanian Center for European Policies company.

In the current year, TechFreedom company and Romanian Center for European Policies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TechFreedom company nor Romanian Center for European Policies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TechFreedom company nor Romanian Center for European Policies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TechFreedom company nor Romanian Center for European Policies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Romanian Center for European Policies company nor TechFreedom company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Romanian Center for European Policies nor TechFreedom holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Romanian Center for European Policies company nor TechFreedom company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TechFreedom company employs more people globally than Romanian Center for European Policies company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Romanian Center for European Policies nor TechFreedom holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Romanian Center for European Policies nor TechFreedom holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Romanian Center for European Policies nor TechFreedom holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Romanian Center for European Policies nor TechFreedom holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Romanian Center for European Policies nor TechFreedom holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Romanian Center for European Policies nor TechFreedom holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X