Comparison Overview

Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC

VS

Hopkins Solicitors Ltd

Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC

401 North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, L.L.C. is a defense–based litigation firm that has been providing legal services since 1919. Conveniently located in Baltimore, we serve clients throughout Maryland and Washington, D.C. We represent national companies, small businesses, and individuals in a wide variety of matters. As a mid–sized law firm, we are large enough to provide skilled attorneys in a variety of practice areas, and small enough to be accessible and responsive to your needs.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hopkins Solicitors Ltd

Eden Court, Crow Hill Drive, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, GB, NG19 7AE
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Hopkins Solicitors are a full service legal firm supporting both local people and local businesses. We are a trusted century old firm with a high reputation in Mansfield, Ashfield and Nottingham for our quality legal advice, given by local friendly solicitors with transparent pricing. The personal approach we take to providing legal advice is one of the reasons our clients continue to use our services time and time again, and why they are happy to recommend Hopkins to others. At Hopkins, we focus on making our services as flexible, straightforward and cost effective as possible with expert teams to handle your case and keep you informed every step of the way. The team at Hopkins has the experience and local knowledge to handle the needs of the Nottinghamshire communities successfully, with some of the team having worked at Hopkins for over 20 years. We are proud that the quality of our service has been recognised by the Law Society with the prestigious LEXCEL standard. This is only given to solicitors’ firms that meet the highest standards of management and customer care. For more information contact us at [email protected] or your nearest office: Eden Court, Crow Hill Drive, Mansfield NG19 7AE 01623 468 468 Waverley House, 37 Westgate, Mansfield NG18 1SH 01623 460 460 Regent Street, Nottingham NG1 5BS 0115 906 8078 Old Market Tavern, Market Place, Sutton-in-Ashfield NG18 1SH 01623 665 050 Wheatley House, 3 Diamond Avenue, Kirkby-in-Ashfield NG17 7GP 01623 668 400

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rollins-smalkin-richards-&-mackie-llc.jpeg
Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hopkins-solicitors-ltd.jpeg
Hopkins Solicitors Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hopkins Solicitors Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hopkins Solicitors Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hopkins Solicitors Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hopkins Solicitors Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rollins-smalkin-richards-&-mackie-llc.jpeg
Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hopkins-solicitors-ltd.jpeg
Hopkins Solicitors Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hopkins Solicitors Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hopkins Solicitors Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC company.

In the current year, Hopkins Solicitors Ltd company and Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hopkins Solicitors Ltd company nor Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hopkins Solicitors Ltd company nor Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hopkins Solicitors Ltd company nor Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC company nor Hopkins Solicitors Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC nor Hopkins Solicitors Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC company nor Hopkins Solicitors Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hopkins Solicitors Ltd company employs more people globally than Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC nor Hopkins Solicitors Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC nor Hopkins Solicitors Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC nor Hopkins Solicitors Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC nor Hopkins Solicitors Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC nor Hopkins Solicitors Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, LLC nor Hopkins Solicitors Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X