Comparison Overview

ROI-NJ

VS

London Review of Books

ROI-NJ

3 Wing Dr, Suite 225, Cedar Knolls, NJ, US, 07927
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

ROI-NJ is an omnichannel business media company and the authoritative source for news and connections impacting New Jersey’s economic movers and shakers. Return On Information - New Jersey (ROI-NJ). Led by longtime industry veteran Tom Hughes and supported by a dedicated team of editors and business professionals, ROI-NJ delivers real-time news and in-depth features that provide New Jersey’s diverse business community with a Return on Information while fostering meaningful connections among key influencers. Through comprehensive coverage, insightful analysis, and dynamic industry engagement, ROI-NJ ensures its readers gain return on information, influence, impact, and investment.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

London Review of Books

28 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

A fortnightly magazine of culture and ideas, the London Review of Books is Europe’s leading literary publication. Unafraid of seriousness and controversy, it provides a space for writers of the stature of Colm Tóibín and Hilary Mantel, Jacqueline Rose and Seymour Hersh, to explore definitive issues in exhilarating detail. Recent essays on the killing of Osama bin Laden and the trial of Oscar Pistorius have upended established narratives with a fearlessness and a quality of writing that is unique in the English-speaking world. In a media landscape increasingly dominated by ‘long reads’, the London Review of Books remains the pre-eminent exponent of the intellectual essay as an art form in its own right, admired around the world by more than 75,000 subscribers. To join them, subscribe today: www.lrb.me/linkedinoffer

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roi-nj.jpeg
ROI-NJ
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-review-of-books.jpeg
London Review of Books
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ROI-NJ
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
London Review of Books
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ROI-NJ in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for London Review of Books in 2025.

Incident History — ROI-NJ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ROI-NJ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — London Review of Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

London Review of Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roi-nj.jpeg
ROI-NJ
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-review-of-books.jpeg
London Review of Books
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

London Review of Books company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ROI-NJ company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, London Review of Books company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ROI-NJ company.

In the current year, London Review of Books company and ROI-NJ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither London Review of Books company nor ROI-NJ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither London Review of Books company nor ROI-NJ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither London Review of Books company nor ROI-NJ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ROI-NJ company nor London Review of Books company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ROI-NJ nor London Review of Books holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ROI-NJ company nor London Review of Books company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

London Review of Books company employs more people globally than ROI-NJ company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither ROI-NJ nor London Review of Books holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ROI-NJ nor London Review of Books holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ROI-NJ nor London Review of Books holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ROI-NJ nor London Review of Books holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ROI-NJ nor London Review of Books holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ROI-NJ nor London Review of Books holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.