Comparison Overview

Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP

VS

Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking

Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP

50 South Main St. 10th Floor, Akron, 44308, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1885, Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP is steeped in experience and tradition. We are progressive in our practice methods, such as providing clients with alternative fee arrangements and utilizing the latest practice methods and technology available to our profession. Our attorneys come from diverse backgrounds and their collective experience allows Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP to represent an equally diverse range of clients from individuals to Fortune 500 companies. Client Base Our established clients include New York Stock Exchange listed public utilities — FirstEnergy Company, and Dominion East Ohio Gas, Summit County Medical Society, the Better Business Bureau of Akron, Kent State University and the University of Akron along with many area businesses. Akron Community Located in Akron, Ohio, Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP has established itself as one of the area's premier law firms and is also recognized for its distinguished service to Akron's surrounding communities and neighboring cities including Cleveland, Canton, Youngstown and Medina and to its regional and national clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking

1400 N Dutton Ave, Santa Rosa, 95401, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Mortgage Repurchase Defense and Indemnification Issues Although the financial crisis is now over and repurchase demand volume has dramatically decreased, Johnston | Thomas gained invaluable experience from the thousands of repurchase and indemnification demands that we handled both in mitigation, litigation and settlement. This deepened our understanding of the nuances of warehouse lending arrangements, mortgage insurance policies, underwriting guidelines, loan purchase and broker agreements, servicing errors and many other areas. Our mortgage lawyers in Santa Rosa have defended clients against lawsuits and other claims from the predominant secondary market investors at the time, including CitiMortgage, Bank of America, BB&T Bank, Chase, Franklin American Mortgage Company, and Residential Funding Company (now ResCap). In addition, we handled a large part of the tidal wave of mitigation cases arising out of repurchase demand claims made by government sponsored entities such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD and other aggregators. Having navigated the complexities of multiple layers of guidelines, agreements, statutes and regulations, we are well prepared to safeguard our clients against these risks in the future. Litigation We are able to provide our clientele with a full range of mortgage-related litigation services, based on a extensive history of representing clients in these areas. Agency Audits and Regulatory Compliance We provide strategic advice to clients including independent banks, credit unions, and mortgage brokers on how to comply with the myriad federal, state and agency requirements. We also advise on state mortgage banking, real property, consumer protection, and consumer finance laws, nationwide. We have experience with the interaction between various levels of law and regulation and pre-emption issues.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roderick-linton-belfance-llp.jpeg
Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnston-thomas-mortgage-banking.jpeg
Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking in 2025.

Incident History — Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roderick-linton-belfance-llp.jpeg
Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnston-thomas-mortgage-banking.jpeg
Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP company.

In the current year, Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking company and Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking company nor Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking company nor Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking company nor Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP company nor Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP nor Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP company.

Neither Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP nor Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP nor Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP nor Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP nor Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP nor Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP nor Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X