Comparison Overview

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc.

VS

WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc.

1819 Denver West Dr., Lakewood, CO 80401, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. is a key supplier of concrete ties to America’s largest freight railroads, as well as the United States’ only High Speed Rail project. Along with many transit projects and industrial applications, our experience in designing concrete ties is the most reliable and cost effective in the world. . The Rocla Concrete Tie Advantage: - Stronger track structure for increased rail life - Lower annual maintenance costs - Engineered product with established performance - Exceptional resitance to weathering and corrosion - Improved track surface, alignment, and gauge holding performance - Energy efficient by reducing locomotive fuel consumption Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. was acquired in 2017. Please follow Vossloh North America

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD

95, Sari-ro, Goesan-gun, 28046, KR
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Woojin Industrial Systems Co., Ltd., founded in 1974, is Korea’s leading manufacturer of rolling stock and electric buses. The company began with the production of electrical components for rolling stock and has since accumulated extensive experience and technological expertise by developing and supplying a wide range of rolling stock and electric buses. Woojin Industrial Systems continues to strengthen its global competitiveness through ongoing research and development in the rolling stock and eco-friendly mobility sectors. Looking ahead, the company is dedicated to driving the future of transportation innovation and evolving into a world-class provider of comprehensive mobility solutions through cutting-edge green technology,

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rocla-concrete-tie-inc-.jpeg
Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woojin-industrial-systems.-ltd.jpeg
WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD in 2025.

Incident History — Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rocla-concrete-tie-inc-.jpeg
Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woojin-industrial-systems.-ltd.jpeg
WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company.

In the current year, WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD company and Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD company nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD company nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD company nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company nor WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. nor WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company nor WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company employs more people globally than WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. nor WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. nor WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. nor WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. nor WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. nor WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. nor WOOJIN Industrial Systems Co., LTD holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H