Comparison Overview

Rocky Heights Print and Binding

VS

Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print]

Rocky Heights Print and Binding

206 Oak Mountain Cr., Pelham, Alabama, 35124, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rockyheightsbinding.com/

Rocky Heights Print and Binding provides business-to-business and custom printing services. We accept both small and large orders for business cards, flyers, hard cover and soft cover books, coil binding, brochures, invitations and booklets as well as publishing services for self-published authors. We have a graphics team on staff to help with designing your project, and our staff is ready to assist you with all your printing needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print]

1801 S. 77 Sunshine Strip, #B6, Harlingen, TX 78550, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.AllegraRGV.com

With two locations in the Rio Grande Valley (Harlingen and Brownsville), Allegra is a part of a franchise organization with approximately 500 locations throughout the United States. We are a full service communications provider specializing in print, digital, design and marketing. In addition to traditional print, copying and engineering blacklines, our services include copywriting and design, E-marketing, Targeted 1:1 marketing, Cross-media marketing with QR codes, List procurement, Logo design and Project Management.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rocky-heights-print-and-binding.jpeg
Rocky Heights Print and Binding
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegra-rgv-marketing-design-print-.jpeg
Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print]
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rocky Heights Print and Binding
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print]
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rocky Heights Print and Binding in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] in 2025.

Incident History — Rocky Heights Print and Binding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rocky Heights Print and Binding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rocky-heights-print-and-binding.jpeg
Rocky Heights Print and Binding
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegra-rgv-marketing-design-print-.jpeg
Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print]
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rocky Heights Print and Binding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rocky Heights Print and Binding company.

In the current year, Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] company and Rocky Heights Print and Binding company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] company nor Rocky Heights Print and Binding company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] company nor Rocky Heights Print and Binding company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] company nor Rocky Heights Print and Binding company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rocky Heights Print and Binding company nor Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rocky Heights Print and Binding nor Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rocky Heights Print and Binding company nor Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rocky Heights Print and Binding company employs more people globally than Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Rocky Heights Print and Binding nor Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rocky Heights Print and Binding nor Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rocky Heights Print and Binding nor Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rocky Heights Print and Binding nor Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rocky Heights Print and Binding nor Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rocky Heights Print and Binding nor Allegra RGV [Marketing|Design|Print] holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References