Comparison Overview

RockRose Risk

VS

Papaya

RockRose Risk

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.rockroserisk.com/

RockRose Risk is an insurance broker and captive underwriting manager, specialized in policies for commercial property owners engaging in risk mitigation. By partnering with leading mitigation companies, we leverage insurance expertise, cutting-edge technology, and automation to provide seamless risk management, credit for ongoing mitigation, and innovative solutions for property owners, insurers, and communities facing the growing threat of wildfires.

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Papaya

undefined, Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, VN
Last Update: 2025-12-29
Between 750 and 799
http://www.papaya.asia

Papaya is created to improve health and happiness of the employees, while simplify benefits administration for Corporate. We are focused on pioneering new employee benefits strategy, by giving the employees the power to make personalized healthcare choices through our Papaya App, and Benefits Administration Portal for Corporate to manage all Employee Benefits aspects, from enrolling employee, adding dependent, to picking the right benefits. Papaya is backed by global funds and strong partnerships with top tier insurers & wellness providers. For more information, please visit: www.papaya.asia

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rockrose-risk.jpeg
RockRose Risk
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/papaya-insurtech.jpeg
Papaya
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RockRose Risk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Papaya
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RockRose Risk in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Papaya in 2026.

Incident History — RockRose Risk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RockRose Risk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Papaya (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Papaya cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rockrose-risk.jpeg
RockRose Risk
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/papaya-insurtech.jpeg
Papaya
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both RockRose Risk company and Papaya company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Papaya company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RockRose Risk company.

In the current year, Papaya company and RockRose Risk company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Papaya company nor RockRose Risk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Papaya company nor RockRose Risk company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Papaya company nor RockRose Risk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RockRose Risk company nor Papaya company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RockRose Risk nor Papaya holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RockRose Risk company nor Papaya company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Papaya company employs more people globally than RockRose Risk company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance Agencies and Brokerages.

Neither RockRose Risk nor Papaya holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RockRose Risk nor Papaya holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RockRose Risk nor Papaya holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RockRose Risk nor Papaya holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RockRose Risk nor Papaya holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RockRose Risk nor Papaya holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References