Comparison Overview

Rochester Public Library (Minnesota)

VS

Laramie County Library System

Rochester Public Library (Minnesota)

101 2nd ST SE, Rochester, MN, 55904, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rplmn.org

As one of four Minnesota libraries to win the National Medal for Museum and Library Service, Rochester Public Library (RPL) aims to "strengthen community and enrich lives by sparking imagination, creativity, engagement, and learning."​ RPL earned the National Medal in 2018 by offering programs and services guided by a community-focused strategic plan. With a robust collection, over half-a-million visitors each year, and the busiest Bookmobile in the state (based on circulation), RPL offers a strong collection of materials to a growing community. The library also continues to expand and develop programming to empower and inspire community members. In 2017, 120,000 individuals attended a wide variety of library programs and activities. Situated in the heart of downtown Rochester, just blocks away from the renowned Mayo Clinic, RPL serves the city of Rochester and surrounding areas. For more information about the Rochester Public Library, visit www.rplmn.org.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Laramie County Library System

2200 Pioneer Ave, Cheyenne, WY, 82001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lclsonline.org

Our mission is to serve the people of Laramie County by encouraging and supporting lifelong learning and adventure. Our vision is to provide opportunities that empower everyone to reach their full potential. Our commitment is to: -Provide free and easy access to the printed word, information and cultural enhancement; -Promote reading and literacy for children and adults; -Offer a dynamic, current, pertinent and uncensored collection of materials in a variety of formats; -Maintain high quality customer service through well-trained professional librarians, managers, staff and volunteers; -Strengthen the library by developing, maintaining and sharing resources in a responsible manner; -Be a focal point for access to information, self-improvement, social interaction, cultural exposure and leisure; -Remain committed to continually utilizing and providing state of the art technology and digital resources; -Provide appropriate facilities to meet the needs of all people of Laramie County; and -Promote the services of the library. Adopted November 22, 2016 by the Laramie County Library System Board of Directors.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rochester-public-library-mn.jpeg
Rochester Public Library (Minnesota)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laramie-county-library-system.jpeg
Laramie County Library System
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rochester Public Library (Minnesota)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Laramie County Library System
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laramie County Library System in 2025.

Incident History — Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Laramie County Library System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laramie County Library System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rochester-public-library-mn.jpeg
Rochester Public Library (Minnesota)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laramie-county-library-system.jpeg
Laramie County Library System
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Laramie County Library System company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Laramie County Library System company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) company.

In the current year, Laramie County Library System company and Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Laramie County Library System company nor Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Laramie County Library System company nor Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Laramie County Library System company nor Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) company nor Laramie County Library System company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) nor Laramie County Library System holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) company nor Laramie County Library System company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Laramie County Library System company employs more people globally than Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) nor Laramie County Library System holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) nor Laramie County Library System holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) nor Laramie County Library System holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) nor Laramie County Library System holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) nor Laramie County Library System holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rochester Public Library (Minnesota) nor Laramie County Library System holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References