Comparison Overview

Robotunits Inc.

VS

CoparSolutions

Robotunits Inc.

8 Corporate Drive, Cranbury, NJ, 08512, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Robotunits develops, manufactures and delivers high quality extrusion and conveyor technology as well as safety fence and linear motion systems for material handling and assembly applications. The idea of the Robotunits modular automation system is to use the least possible number of components to offer a maximum of possible solutions. For Robotunits customers, this translates into time and cost savings in design, logistics, storage, training and assembly.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CoparSolutions

5744 W 77th St, Burbank, Illinois, 60459, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

For more than 60 years, Copar has earned a valuable reputation for providing user friendly, robust control systems for the corrugated and packaging industries. Over 5000 installations across the globe have helped Copar earn a reputation for high customer confidence and satisfaction. In 1953, Copar opened its doors under the name Industrial Measurement and Controls. Initially we created test equipment for the jet engine bearing industry, but later moved into the steel and paper manufacturing industries. The company name changed to IMAC in 1955 and then finally to Copar Corporation in 1960. By 1972, we expanded internationally with the formation of Copar International. Copar services the United States and Canada directly from our home office located in Burbank, Illinois. Copar has trained service and support agents in many regions around the world including Mexico, South America, Africa, Europe, Israel and Egypt.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robotunitsinc.jpeg
Robotunits Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/copar-corporation.jpeg
CoparSolutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Robotunits Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CoparSolutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Robotunits Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CoparSolutions in 2025.

Incident History — Robotunits Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Robotunits Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CoparSolutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CoparSolutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robotunitsinc.jpeg
Robotunits Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/copar-corporation.jpeg
CoparSolutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CoparSolutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Robotunits Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CoparSolutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Robotunits Inc. company.

In the current year, CoparSolutions company and Robotunits Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CoparSolutions company nor Robotunits Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CoparSolutions company nor Robotunits Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CoparSolutions company nor Robotunits Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Robotunits Inc. company nor CoparSolutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Robotunits Inc. nor CoparSolutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Robotunits Inc. company nor CoparSolutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Robotunits Inc. company employs more people globally than CoparSolutions company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Robotunits Inc. nor CoparSolutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Robotunits Inc. nor CoparSolutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Robotunits Inc. nor CoparSolutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Robotunits Inc. nor CoparSolutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Robotunits Inc. nor CoparSolutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Robotunits Inc. nor CoparSolutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H