Comparison Overview

robominds GmbH

VS

The Simmonds Group

robominds GmbH

Wilhelmine-Reichard Straße 7, Munich, Bavaria, 80935, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Smart Robotics – for everyone. We are passionate about robotics innovations that will move you forward. ‘Making robots smart’ is our vision, mission and everyday business – at the best possible level. We don’t ask “Does it work?” but “How does it work?”. In any case, the answer is: with a powerful, interdisciplinary team. Together we raise robotics to a new level, towards real artificial intelligence and therefore to real automation, realizable and affordable for every size of company.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Simmonds Group

815 Grandview Ave, Columbus, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Process Control Headhunters. Factory Automation. Executive Search firm specializing in Process Control and Factory Automation. Our clients include small to mid-size firms as well as Fortune 500 companies. We enable you to access one of the largest talent pools and a broad range of services to meet your hiring goals.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robominds-gmbh.jpeg
robominds GmbH
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-simmonds-group-mrinetwork.jpeg
The Simmonds Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
robominds GmbH
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Simmonds Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for robominds GmbH in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Simmonds Group in 2025.

Incident History — robominds GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

robominds GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Simmonds Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Simmonds Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robominds-gmbh.jpeg
robominds GmbH
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-simmonds-group-mrinetwork.jpeg
The Simmonds Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Simmonds Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to robominds GmbH company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Simmonds Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to robominds GmbH company.

In the current year, The Simmonds Group company and robominds GmbH company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Simmonds Group company nor robominds GmbH company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Simmonds Group company nor robominds GmbH company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Simmonds Group company nor robominds GmbH company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither robominds GmbH company nor The Simmonds Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither robominds GmbH nor The Simmonds Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither robominds GmbH company nor The Simmonds Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

robominds GmbH company employs more people globally than The Simmonds Group company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither robominds GmbH nor The Simmonds Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither robominds GmbH nor The Simmonds Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither robominds GmbH nor The Simmonds Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither robominds GmbH nor The Simmonds Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither robominds GmbH nor The Simmonds Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither robominds GmbH nor The Simmonds Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H