Comparison Overview

Robinson & McElwee PLLC

VS

Kew Law LLP

Robinson & McElwee PLLC

700 Virginia Street East, Charleston, WV, 25301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Robinson & McElwee PLLC is a West Virginia-based law firm with offices in Charleston, Clarksburg and Wheeling, WV, and Alliance, OH. Our practice is multifaceted and includes litigation, natural resources law, corporate law, labor and employment law, utility law, bankruptcy, commercial real estate development, environmental law, state and local taxation, estate planning and administration, commercial transactions, and government relations.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kew Law LLP

55 North Hill, Colchester, Essex, CO1 1PX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Kew Law LLP Solicitors provides a wide range of legal services to both business and private clients throughout Essex and beyond. Founded in 2009 by Stephen Kew and Jacqueline Farrow, Kew Law has successfully grown to a 13-branch firm with offices in Colchester, Witham, Braintree, Maldon, Wickford, Clacton, Rayleigh, Burnham-on-Crouch, Halstead, Hadleigh, Chelmsford, South Woodham Ferrers, and Sudbury. Kew Law LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership Registered Number OC345367. Registered Office in England and Wales 55 North Hill, Colchester, CO1 1PX. A list of members is available from the Registered Office. Partner denotes Member. Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. SRA Number 516121

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 85
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robinson-&-mcelwee.jpeg
Robinson & McElwee PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kew-law-llp.jpeg
Kew Law LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Robinson & McElwee PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kew Law LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Robinson & McElwee PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kew Law LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Robinson & McElwee PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Robinson & McElwee PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kew Law LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kew Law LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robinson-&-mcelwee.jpeg
Robinson & McElwee PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kew-law-llp.jpeg
Kew Law LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Robinson & McElwee PLLC company and Kew Law LLP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Kew Law LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Robinson & McElwee PLLC company.

In the current year, Kew Law LLP company and Robinson & McElwee PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kew Law LLP company nor Robinson & McElwee PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kew Law LLP company nor Robinson & McElwee PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kew Law LLP company nor Robinson & McElwee PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Robinson & McElwee PLLC company nor Kew Law LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Robinson & McElwee PLLC nor Kew Law LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Robinson & McElwee PLLC company nor Kew Law LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kew Law LLP company employs more people globally than Robinson & McElwee PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Robinson & McElwee PLLC nor Kew Law LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Robinson & McElwee PLLC nor Kew Law LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Robinson & McElwee PLLC nor Kew Law LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Robinson & McElwee PLLC nor Kew Law LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Robinson & McElwee PLLC nor Kew Law LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Robinson & McElwee PLLC nor Kew Law LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X