Comparison Overview

Robinhood

VS

L&T Finance

Robinhood

Menlo Park, California, US, 94025
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Trade. Invest. Earn.  rbnhd.co/social_media_disclosures

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 4,307
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

L&T Finance

Plot no. 177, CST Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 098, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

L&T Finance is one of the leading NBFCs offering a range of loans across Rural | Housing | Two-Wheeler | Personal & Business (SME) The company is promoted by Larsen and Toubro Ltd. (L&T), one of the largest conglomerates in India. LTF is publicly listed on both the exchanges of India - BSE & NSE and complies to the guidelines applicable to an NBFC- CIC. Headquartered in Mumbai, the company has been rated AAA, the highest credit rating for NBFCs by four leading rating agencies.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 15,839
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robinhood.jpeg
Robinhood
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&t-finance.jpeg
L&T Finance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Robinhood
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
L&T Finance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

Robinhood has 20.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&T Finance in 2025.

Incident History — Robinhood (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Robinhood cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — L&T Finance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&T Finance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robinhood.jpeg
Robinhood
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing (Fake Job Offers), Social Engineering (ClickFix), Malicious Command-Line Execution, Fake Skill Assessment Websites
Motivation: Financial Gain (Cryptocurrency Theft), Sanctions Evasion, Intelligence Gathering, Revenue Generation for Regime
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&t-finance.jpeg
L&T Finance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Robinhood company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to L&T Finance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Robinhood company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas L&T Finance company has not reported any.

In the current year, Robinhood company has reported more cyber incidents than L&T Finance company.

Neither L&T Finance company nor Robinhood company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Robinhood company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other L&T Finance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Robinhood company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while L&T Finance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Robinhood company nor L&T Finance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Robinhood nor L&T Finance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Robinhood company nor L&T Finance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

L&T Finance company employs more people globally than Robinhood company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Robinhood nor L&T Finance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Robinhood nor L&T Finance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Robinhood nor L&T Finance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Robinhood nor L&T Finance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Robinhood nor L&T Finance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Robinhood nor L&T Finance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N