Comparison Overview

Robert Half

VS

Job

Robert Half

2884 Sand Hill Road Suite 200, None, Menlo Park, CA, US, 94025
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

🔒 At Robert Half, we prioritize your security—if you believe you've encountered a scam or fraudulent recruiter, please report it immediately to https://www.roberthalf.com/us/en/fraud-alert. All Robert Half recruiters communicate using their corporate email address, ending in roberthalf.com. 👋 Welcome to Robert Half. We're the world’s first and largest specialized talent solutions firm, connecting opportunities at great companies with highly skilled job seekers. We provide dynamic contract, temporary, and permanent placement solutions across finance, accounting, technology, marketing, creative, legal, and administrative sectors. 🏆 In the last 12 months, Robert Half has been recognized as one of America’s Most Innovative Companies by Fortune, and with Protiviti, has been named one of the Fortune® World's Most Admired Companies™ and 100 Best Companies to Work For. 🏦 Traded on the New York Stock Exchange (symbol: RHI), we’re at the forefront of innovation in talent acquisition.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 28,722
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Job

New York Throughway, Nassau, New York, 12123, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

🚀 Welcome to JobsAICopilot, the pioneering platform in AI-driven job application automation! As featured on Yahoo Finance, Business Insider, ProductHunt, and Marketwatch, we're the leaders in transforming how job seekers engage with the market. 🔍 How It Works: Setup Once, Apply Forever: Begin with a one-time setup—tell your AI copilot what jobs you're targeting, using our extensive filter options. Upload your resume, answer a few screening questions, and you're set! Daily Job Applications: Each day, your copilot scours over 50,000+ company career pages, identifying new openings and automatically applying on your behalf. Forget about missing out on opportunities or applying too late; your AI copilot handles it all. 💡 Why Choose JobsAICopilot? Maximize Interview Chances: Manually, you might need to apply to 50-100 jobs to secure an interview. With JobsAICopilot, send up to 50 applications daily, drastically increasing your interview odds. Never Miss Out: Our AI continuously monitors job postings, ensuring you never miss fresh, relevant opportunities. Save Valuable Time: Reclaim hours every week as your copilot efficiently manages job searches and applications, allowing you to focus on what truly matters. 🛡️ Apply with Confidence: Each application is sent to verified job listings on official company career pages, ensuring every job opportunity is legitimate and secure.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46,462
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robert-half-international.jpeg
Robert Half
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/govt.-of-india.jpeg
Job
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Robert Half
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Job
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Robert Half in 2025.

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Job in 2025.

Incident History — Robert Half (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Robert Half cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Job (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Job cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robert-half-international.jpeg
Robert Half
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/govt.-of-india.jpeg
Job
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Job company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Robert Half company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Robert Half company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Job company has not reported any.

In the current year, Job company and Robert Half company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Job company nor Robert Half company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Robert Half company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Job company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Job company nor Robert Half company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Robert Half company nor Job company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Robert Half nor Job holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Robert Half company nor Job company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Job company employs more people globally than Robert Half company, reflecting its scale as a Staffing and Recruiting.

Neither Robert Half nor Job holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Robert Half nor Job holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Robert Half nor Job holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Robert Half nor Job holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Robert Half nor Job holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Robert Half nor Job holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H