Comparison Overview

ROBEL

VS

Lewis Bolt and Nut Company

ROBEL

Industriestraße 31, Freilassing, Bayern, 83395, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

For more than 100 years ROBEL has been producing technologically exigent solutions for rail construction. Based in Freilassing, Bavaria the company delivers custom-made machines, systems and services for the construction and maintenance of track infrastructure facilities to 70 countries worldwide. In addition to a wide range of hand guided machines and equipment the ROBEL portfolio includes multifunctional track vehicles as well as mobile maintenance and loading systems for more security and effectivity on track. All production processes, carried out in-house by a total of 600 employees, are EN ISO 9001 certified. Extensive customer service – from inspection, repairs and modification over spare part management up to revisions and re-certifications – accompanies each ROBEL machine over the full product life. ROBEL. Great on Track. Please contact us and learn more about our solutions for track construction and maintenance. IMPRINT: https://www.robel.com/en/imprint-and-general-terms-of-business/

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 236
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lewis Bolt and Nut Company

30105 6th Ave. , La Junta, Colorado, 81050, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

At Lewis Bolt and Nut we are continuously working to take the railroad fastening industry to the next level by exceeding the expectations of our customers with top quality fastening products, the fastest service available, and knowledgeable, prompt communication. We strive to build products that improve performance, save time and ultimately reduce maintenance costs. In addition, we are recognized as the industry leader in engineering, quality, testing, and machining. We have unmatched service in the design and production of fasteners and forgings.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robel-bahnbaumaschinen-gmbh.jpeg
ROBEL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lewisboltandnut.jpeg
Lewis Bolt and Nut Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ROBEL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lewis Bolt and Nut Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ROBEL in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lewis Bolt and Nut Company in 2025.

Incident History — ROBEL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ROBEL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lewis Bolt and Nut Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lewis Bolt and Nut Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robel-bahnbaumaschinen-gmbh.jpeg
ROBEL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lewisboltandnut.jpeg
Lewis Bolt and Nut Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ROBEL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ROBEL company.

In the current year, Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company and ROBEL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company nor ROBEL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company nor ROBEL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company nor ROBEL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ROBEL company nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ROBEL nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ROBEL company nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ROBEL company employs more people globally than Lewis Bolt and Nut Company company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither ROBEL nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ROBEL nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ROBEL nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ROBEL nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ROBEL nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ROBEL nor Lewis Bolt and Nut Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H